Today marks Joe Biden’s 100th day in office, and it’s becoming evident that there’s some buyer’s remorse out there.
The mainstream media pollsters would like you to think otherwise – and are willing to torture the data to do so. We were told by CBS following Biden’s first joint address to Congress that an incredible 85% of Americans approved of the speech – according to a poll that sampled only 169 Republicans out of 943 people polled. The Hill reported that according to a Harvard CAPS-Harris poll, Biden’s approval rating was as high as 61% in March – only to wait until the end of the article to add the disclaimer that this was an online sample “weighted to reflect known demographics.”null
Amid a growing border crisis that the administration refuses to address, Biden pushing back his timeline for all schools reopening from “within my first 100 days” to fall, an unprecedented use of executive authority, a lack of press conferences from Biden and Kamala Harris, and much more, his first 100 days have been as popular as anyone paying attention would expect.
Most voters don’t give him high marks at this milestone of his presidency.
The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone and online survey finds that just 36% of Likely U.S. Voters say Biden’s first 100 days in office have been a success. Forty-four percent (44%) say Biden’s first 100 days have been a failure, and 18% say it’s been somewhere in between.
Only 26% of voters say Biden has proven to be a better president than they expected. Thirty-nine percent (39%) say Biden has proven to be a worse president then they expected, and 33% say Biden’s performance as president has been about what they thought it would be.
These results are more in the line with what you’d expect considering the real and perceived utter lack of enthusiasm there is for Biden. Only 26.9 million tuned into Biden’s first speech to a joint session of Congress this week, roughly half of what Donald Trump’s first State of the Union Address brought in.
Electronically translated Last weekend, a complaint from the organization “People of Truth” was filed with the Hague Tribunal by lawyers Ruth Machnes and Aryeh Suchowolski, of the law firm A. Suchovolsky and Co., concerning violations of the Nuremberg Code by the Israeli government and other parties. However, the complaint filed last week before the International Criminal Court was accepted. It is now awaiting a decision.
Lawyer Ruth Machnes told Israel News on 5 March that “at the same time, the complaint will also be filed in the Nuremberg court, along with German lawyer Reiner Fullmich. On Monday, the complaint will be filed in the High Court by Aryeh Suchowolski in Israel, concerning the violation of the Nuremberg Code. The lawyer added six days later:“Pfizer’s experience in the State of Israel was conducted in violation of the Nuremberg Code, which is part of international criminal law and is under the jurisdiction of the Hague court. We are now awaiting a decision. »
The complaint filed with the court reads
We are speaking to you on behalf of the Anshei Emet Association, an association in the making, whose members are lawyers, doctors, public activists and in general, who have chosen to exercise their democratic right not to receive experimental medical treatment (Corona Immunization), and who believe that great pressure, harsh and illegal, is exerted on them on behalf of the Government of Israel, members of the Knesset, ministers, elected officials of the public, city leaders and more.
The letter of acceptance of the International Criminal Court, signed by Mark Dillon.
We want to start with basic knowledge on the subject: Corona vaccine is an innovative medical treatment, which has only recently obtained FDA approval in the United States (as part of an emergency procedure only), an approval that is not final and with details on 22 side effects of the vaccine. In addition, it is clear to all medical factors that the subject of the long-term influence of the treatment has not been scientifically tested (tests and research), and the long-term effect and safety of the treatment on its recipients are unknown. It is important to note that never before have immunisations been administered worldwide by this medical technology introducing a synthetic M-RNA into the body, and all previous immunizations have worked in a totally different way, by introducing a weakened or weakened virus and natural arousal of the immune system against it. As detailed by a senior virologist, the risks anticipated by this innovative medical treatment are attached in Appendix 1 to my letter.
« Nuremberg Code — A code of medical ethics published on the basis of the laws under which Nazi criminals were tried for conducting horrific medical experiments during World War II in the trial of doctors known as the Nuremberg Trial. The Nuremberg Code then formed the basis of the legislation of the Helsinki Declaration and the basis of the Law on the Rights of Patients in Israel. We intend to introduce you and detail how, in the State of Israel this year, the Government of Israel with its ministers and members of the Knesset, the heads of cities and other senior officials are blatantly violating the Nuremberg Code. and extreme, and to our regret, not only in one aspect but much, too!
(a) Informed consent to participate in a medical experiment — a first principle of the Nuremberg Code is the willingness and informed consent of the person to receive treatment and participate in an experiment. The person is supposed to activate freedom of choice without the intervention of a factor using force, deception, fraud, threat, solicitation or any other type of liaison or coercion. When the heads of the Ministry of Health and the Prime Minister presented the vaccine in Israel and began vaccinating Israeli residents, the vaccinated have not been informed, that in practice they are participating in a medical experiment and that their consent is required for this purpose under the Nuremberg Code, and only when it became clear that the Prime Minister had actually signed an agreement with Pfizer (the manufacturer), it was first published and also stated by the Prime Minister, that it was indeed a medical experiment, and that this was the essence of the agreement. It is in fact a genetic medical experiment on human beings, carried out without informed consent and under a serious and flagrant violation of the Nuremberg Code.
b) The Bibi-Pfizer Agreement. After factum, it became clear that the Prime Minister of Israel signed an agreement with the Pfizer Company (the manufacturing company), under which he will receive a huge amount of millions of servings of vaccines, and with a preference over other countries, and in return, the vaccinated (residents of Israel) will serve as “experimenters” for the pharmaceutical company. It was agreed that the pharmaceutical company would receive all of Israel’s secret medical and personal information without its knowledge or prior consent. In addition, we must declare that until this time, the content of the agreement concerning most residents of the State of Israel, has not been published, which is mandatory transparency under the law, and it was published with “blackout” / concealment of a large amount of information included in this agreement. It should be said and remembered that we do not live in a country of dictatorship, so that obviously such an agreement must be subject to full transparency to the general public.
c) Alternative treatments. With regard to informed consent for medical treatment, and on the basis of the principles of the Nuremberg Code, there is an obligation to detail and suggest to a patient several alternative treatments, also detailing the medical process (and all that is included). such as the pros and cons/benefits and risks, existing in each treatment, to enable him to make an intelligent personal decision regarding the treatment he prefers. As stated, this must be done without exerting pressure and freely, as a free person. Despite all the above, the State of Israel and the Ministry of Health do not present to Israeli citizens the existing alternatives to treat Corona disease, which have proven to be effective and with few side effects, and not dangerous ones. They solicit and pressure citizens (while blatantly violating the informed consent process), conceal information about vaccinations and create a severe atmosphere of fear and coercion.
(d) A fourth principle is that the experiment will be conducted to avoid physical suffering or injury. Treatment is known to have caused many people’s death, serious injuries and damage (including disability and paralysis) after the vaccine was administered. Despite this fact, the government did not order an investigation into the matter. It is interesting to note that the Ministry of Health has openly admitted that 41% of police, military, educational and medical personnel, who had been vaccinated, suffered serious side effects and were putting their lives at risk. It is also surprising that there are no complete reports on the number of deaths or injuries, as can be expected in such a medical process for the benefit of the public participating in the experiment.
(e) A fifth principle states that the experiment should not be conducted where there is reason to assume that actual death or injury will occur. Regarding the violation of this principle, see above. As noted, when it comes to data on deaths, we only hear by word of mouth on social networks (by friends, neighbours or relatives) and not on the central media.
(f) An additional principle is that the factor responsible for the experiment will be prepared to stop it at any stage if there is a reasonable reason to assume that it will cause injury, disability or death of the experience participant. It has already been proven that many people died from treatment, were injured, became disabled and paralyzed; however, the Israeli government continues to impose this dangerous experience on Israeli citizens.
(g) Recent publications demonstrating gross and criminal violations of the Nuremberg Code on behalf of the government, ministers and knesset members, city leaders and senior civil servants, as well as employers:
Below are some examples (among many others) of violations of the Nuremberg Code (which will be attached to Appendix 2 of my letter).
Exercise economic pressure:
The Manufacturers’ Association, supported by a legal opinion, threatens to send any employee who is not vaccinated on leave without pay.
Health Minister Yuli Edelstein wants to enact legislation that will prevent the arrival of the unvaccinated in the workplace.
Do not refuse unemployment charges.
The exercise of social pressure:
1. A threat to prevent access to entertainment, recreation and reception of community services.
Artists, opinion leaders and representatives of the public, who in every corner choose to make propaganda, and in an aggressive and insulting way, even propose punishments and sanctions. (Member of the Knesset Ayelet Shaked, member of the Knesset Smotrich, Health Minister Edelstein, member of the Knesset Benet, host of the morning show Avri Gilad, singer Yoram Gaon, Judy Nir Moses and others)
Vehicles with public address systems wandering the streets urging people to arrive for vaccinations, conversations and aggressive reviews from health insurance companies, and even setting appointments for vaccinations without the wishes of insurers, and more.
Prohibited incentives for vaccinated:
Receive a free night in a hotel, vacation days, etc., offered by the owners of various businesses to their employees.
Discounts in various commercial, private and public institutions, as well as a benefit card promoted by the government.
The Israeli Prime Minister has repeatedly stated that Israeli citizens are participating in this innovative medical experiment for the benefit of all the citizens of the world, who, for whatever reason, are not rushing to get the aforementioned medical treatment, and they are eagerly awaiting to see the Israeli experimenters. The same is true of the government’s agreement with Pfizer, which has been overshadowed in many places, raising questions about the government’s agreements with Pfizer.
It is now pointed out that the means currently activated against citizens, including the proposed legislation against anyone who has not been vaccinated, contradict not only the Nuremberg Code and the autonomy of the individual over his body, but also the legislation in force in Israel, including the Basic Law on the Dignity and Freedom of Persons. , the Freedom of Occupancy Act, the Patient Rights Act, the Equal Works of Opportunity Act, the Prohibition of Discrimination in Goods, Services and the Access to Entertainment and Public Places Act, and other laws.
Therefore, and in light of the above, we make two main requests to your honour:
Immediately interrupt the medical experience and the administration of vaccines to the public of Israeli citizens.
Instruct the Government to initiate all legislative proceedings that violate the principle of informed consent of a person to receive the medical treatment described above, and which denies the legal status in Israel and in Israeli democracy, including avoiding legislating on the Green Passport, handing over the names of those who are not vaccinated to local authorities or any other harmful legislature.
Act with the most appropriate severity against any public/commercial/professional entity, which violates state laws on employment or other subjects necessary to prevent coercion, coercion or solicitation of vaccination, as well as the object of discrimination, against those who have made the choice not to receive the above innovative medical treatment.
We ask you to bring to your attention that a copy of this document will also be transmitted to media channels around the world because the violation of the Nuremberg Code is relevant in all countries of the free world.
Finally, it is stated that it was only recently that a decision was taken in the European Parliament on27/1/21,urging all authorities not to pressure or solicit people to take the Corona vaccine in any way. Therefore, all that is good for the advanced European states is certainly good for Israel — and the balance is obvious.
Legal representation and home election Candidates will be represented for the purposes of this procedure by
Therefore, any subsequent correspondence should only be sent to the postal and/or electronic addresses listed above. Any notification within the meaning of the Statute of the Court addressed in this way will be considered valid.
Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla Admits Israel Is the ‘World’s Lab’
If Israelis are confused by the fact that their government treats them like laboratory pets, if they wonder why their freedom to travel, to socialise or even earn a living have evaporated, Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla produced a genuine answer yesterday. In an interview on NBC Bourla said:
“I believe Israel has become the world’s lab right now because they are using only our vaccine at this state and they have vaccinated a very big part of their population, so we can study both economy and health indices.”
I have no issue with medical experiments involving humans if the participants are fully aware of all possible circumstances and considerations involved in their consent. This didn’t happen in Israel. By means of ‘green passports,’ the government practically threatens to penalise anyone reluctant to participate in a ‘lab’ experiment for a giant pharmaceutical company with a very problematic record.
The results of this Pfizer-Israeli experiment aren’t necessarily encouraging. Though it may be possible, as some studies suggest, that most vaccinated people have at least short-term protection from Covid-19, no one can deny the astonishing fact that in just 8 weeks of mass vaccination the total number of Covid-19 deaths in the Jewish State almost doubled from the number accumulated in the prior ten months. Read more athttps://www.unz.com/gatzmon/hot-off-the-press-pfizer-ceo-albert-bourla-admits-israel-is-the-worlds-lab/
Israeli company prohibits employees from returning to work without COVID-19 vaccination
Mobileye, an Israeli self-driving car developer and subsidiary of Intel, will ban employees who reject a coronavirus vaccination from working on-site, CEO Amnon Shashua said.
In this file photo White House Chief Medical Adviser on Covid-19 Dr. Anthony Fauci listens as US President Joe Biden (out of frame) speaks about the 50 million doses of the Covid-19 vaccine shot administered in the US in February 2021 Photograph:( AFP )
Fauci also said that “no one likes likes to lock down the country”, while urging Indian authorities to lock down the country for a “few weeks”
Top US infectious disease expert Anthony Fauci on Saturday urged India to go into a nationwide lockdown in response to the ongoing surge in COVID-19 cases.
“I think the most important thing in the immediate is to get oxygen, get supplies, get medication, get PPE, those kinds of things,” The Indian Express quoted Fauci as saying.
Meanwhile the US Government and Pfizer are withholding vaccines from India. W
A member of Congress who received a COVID-19 vaccine has tested positive for the disease. Rep. Stephen Lynch …
A member of Congress who received a COVID-19 vaccine has tested positive for the disease.
Rep. Stephen Lynch (D-Mass.) tested positive for COVID-19 after receiving two doses of Pfizer’s vaccine.
“Congressman Lynch had received the second dose of the Pfizer vaccine and subsequently received a negative COVID-19 test prior to attending President [Joe] Biden’s inauguration,” a spokeswoman told news outlets.
The inauguration was nine days before Lynch tested positive.
Pfizer has said its vaccine is 95 percent effective in preventing COVID-19 in those without prior infection 7 days or more after the second dose. In an email, the company told The Epoch Times it does not know the specific details of Lynch’s case.
“Data from the Phase 3 study demonstrated that, although partial protection from the vaccine appears to begin as early as 12 days after the first dose, two doses of the vaccine (21 days apart) are required to provide the maximum protection against the disease, a vaccine efficacy of 95%. There are no data to demonstrate that protection after the first dose is sustained after 21 days. Protection after the second dose kicks in after seven days,” a spokesperson said.
Drug regulators said last month in issuing emergency use authorization that data is not available to show how long the vaccine would provide protection, “nor is there evidence that the vaccine prevents transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from person to person.”
Fox News has hit on its latest target in the pandemic culture wars, blasting nascent efforts around so-called vaccination “passports” that would allow businesses to safely reintegrate customers by ensuring they’d received the jab. (As Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Rochelle Walenskysaid Tuesday, data suggests fully vaccinated people do not carry COVID-19.) Fox Nation host Tomi Lahrenappeared on Fox & FriendsTuesday to warn that “vaccine passports will be the new masks,” calling the credentials—which would be optional, just as vaccines are—“un-American and likely unconstitutional” in a monologue that also managed to rope in conservative talking points on immigration and voting rights. A night earlier, Fox’s Next Revolution host Steve Hiltonsaid that with the return to normalcy on the horizon, the White House wants vaccine passports “to control who can go where, when,” calling them an “unprecedented, undemocratic power grab” and “nightmare Orwellian infrastructure of control.”
So far, the concern might be a tad overblown. The Biden administration is reportedly coordinating with private companies to create a unified way for people to show proof of vaccination against COVID-19—an initiative other countries are moving ahead with, too. It also smacks of hypocrisy. As Fox personalities decry a credential system, CNN’s Brian Stelterreports that other corners of the network are embracing pandemic protocol, requiring behavioral changes to limit the spread of COVID in much the same way that a vaccine passport would. According to Stelter, guests who want to attend a live tapingof Fox News host Greg Gutfeld’s show must test negative for COVID-19 upon arrival and pass an online health screening to participate, in addition to following precautions such as wearing a face covering (provided upon check-in) throughout the show and social distancing.
The anti-passport remarks recall a broader conspiratorial narrative that many conservative outlets have latched onto, particularly since Joe Biden took office: that Democratic administrations seek to control every aspect of public life and are using COVID to help realize that goal. “Me and others warned about this over a year ago when we started giving up our rights,” Lahren said. “You think they’re just going to let you get back to normal life and live it all in freedom after this?” Hilton asked. (The White House has repeatedly stressed that there will be no national passport mandate.)
Republican lawmakers have likewise politicized the issue, the Washington Postreports. “It’s completely unacceptable for either the government or the private sector to impose upon you the requirement that you show proof of vaccine to just simply be able to participate in normal society,” Florida Governor Ron DeSantissaid Monday, as he pledged to take executive action to bar the use of “any vaccine passports in the state of Florida.” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greenecalled the passport “Biden’s mark of the beast” and said any company deploying one is partaking in “corporate communism.” Like Lahren did on Fox, Rep. Jim Jordan used the issue to attack Biden on immigration, and House Minority Whip Steve Scalise claimed a passport would be inconsistent with Democrats’ position on voting rights. “Considering that Democrats want to require vaccine IDs for people to conduct their basic daily activities, they now have zero grounds to object to voter ID laws,” he told Fox News.
While opposition to a vaccine passport sounds similar to the “cancel culture” issues conservative media has recently latched onto, the Post notes that the topic taps into a few crucial ideas that could give it resonance—not only the right’s existing fear of an all-powerful government and Big Tech’s infringement on privacy, but also resistance to perceived limits on personal freedom that have become a defining feature of the right’s pandemic approach. “There’s been this pent-up opposition to lockdowns and mask mandates and so this is building on that,” David Boaz of the libertarian think tank Cato Institute told the paper. “Now there’s this suggestion that if you don’t get a vaccine, you might not be able to do—we’re not quite sure what. I can see how there’s a market for that concern.”