Fauci Says The Pandemic Is Over… Then Walks It Back After He Is Dressed Down By The White House

By Adam Wilson | Apr 28, 2022

Fauci has shielded himself from criticism by claiming that he is not beholden to politicians and that his recommendations are solely based on the ‘science.’

During Trump’s presidency, Fauci consistently contradicted Trump, including when Trump was attempting to get the US past Covid-19 so that authoritarian lockdowns could be lifted.

It turns out that Fauci, like other government bureaucrats who claim to be apolitical, is willing to tweak his messaging when he is pressured by Democratic politicians and liberal activists.

Last week, Fauci said that the United States was ‘out of the pandemic phase’ and that infections and deaths were at a low level.

“We are certainly right now in this country out of the pandemic phase,” Fauci said. “Namely we don’t have 900,000 new infections a day and tens and tens and tens of thousands of hospitalizations and thousands of deaths. We are at a low level right now.”

“So, if you’re saying, are we out of the pandemic phase in this country, we are. What we hope to do, I don’t believe, and I have spoken about this widely, we’re not going to eradicate this virus,” he said. “If we can keep that level very low, and intermittently vaccinate people — and I don’t know how often that would have to be.”

Then, the White House contradicted him, saying that the pandemic ‘isn’t over. Biden clearly intends to milk the pandemic for all its worth with midterms coming up and isn’t willing to let ‘science’ get in the way.

“COVID isn’t over, and the pandemic isn’t over,” Psaki told reporters on Wednesday.

Presumably, Fauci got a private dressing down from the Biden White House after they were forced to contradict him.  Yesterday, he walked back his comments and claimed that he only intended to say that the ‘acute’ phase of the pandemic is over.

“I want to clarify one thing,” Fauci told NPR on Wednesday. “I probably should have said the acute component of the pandemic phase, and I understand how that can lead to some misinterpretation.”

It’s great to know that we are basing the science on what a man who can’t even string a coherent sentencetogether wants it to be.

Source: https://100percentfedup.com/fauci-says-the-pandemic-is-over-then-walks-it-back-after-he-is-dressed-down-by-the-white-house/

US economy shrank 1.4% at beginning of 2022, marking worst quarter in 2 years

US economy shrank 1.4% at beginning of 2022, marking worst quarter in 2 years

Economists expected the economy to expand by 1.1%, a marked slowdown from 2021

Published 11 hours ago

Harvard University professor Kenneth Rogoff, a former chief economist at the International Monetary Fund, tells 'Mornings with Maria' that GDP falling at a 1.4% annualized rate is 'even below the worst' he thought it might have been. 


The U.S. economy cooled markedly in the first three months of the year, as snarled supply chains, record-high inflation and labor shortages weighed on growth and slowed the pandemic recovery.

Gross domestic product, the broadest measure of goods and services produced across the economy, shrank by 1.4% on an annualized basis in the three-month period from January through March, the Commerce Department said in its first reading of the data on Thursday. 


Refinitiv economists expected the report to show the economy had expanded by 1.1%. It marked the worst performance since the spring of 2020, when the U.S. economy was still deep in the throes of the COVID-induced recession. 

inflation groceries

“Today’s shock drop in GDP is a wake-up call that the economy isn’t as strong as we all thought,” said Chris Zaccarelli, chief investment officer for Independent Advisor Alliance. “It’s possible that GDP gets revised higher next month, as this is just the first release and there will be two revisions, but it is a warning sign.”

The headline figure often obscures the whole picture because the Commerce Department calculates the GDP on a quarter-over-quarter basis as if that level of growth were sustained for a full year; in times of huge swings up or down, it can exaggerate both the decline in growth and the subsequent rebound.

Looking at the quarterly data, the nation’s GDP declined by about 0.3% from the fourth quarter to the first quarter, compared with an increase of 1.68% between the third and fourth quarter. 

Port California economy

The substantial downturn stems from a widening trade deficit, with the U.S. importing far more than it exported: In the three-month period from January to March, imports surged by nearly 20% as businesses and consumers bought more goods from abroad. But exports fell about 6% – an imbalance that widened the trade deficit. 

The U.S. also saw a slower pace of inventory investment by businesses in the first quarter, following a surge in investors at the end of 2021 as companies restocked in anticipation of the holiday-shopping season.

But key pillars of the economy – consumer spending and business investment – remained solid last quarter: Businesses and consumers boosted their spending by 3.6% at the start of the year, compared with 6.1% last year. Another bright spot in the economy is the jobs market. Unemployment fell to 3.6% last month, the lowest level since the pandemic began in February 2020, and jobless claims have continued to fall amid an exceptionally tight labor market.

“Huge miss on GDP this morning, but just looking at headlines is misleading,” said Cliff Hodge, chief investment officer for Cornerstone Wealth. “We’d rate the report neutral overall. Trade, inventories and government spending all dragged, but the consumer held up and business investment was strong.”

Mall shoppers Virginia

The latest data comes amid growing fears on Wall Street that a recession is looming in the next two years as a result of the Russian war in Ukraine, soaring inflation and an increasingly hawkish Federal Reserve. With the consumer price index at a 40-year high, the U.S. central bank is moving quickly to raise rates in an effort to cool demand. 

Fed policymakers hiked the benchmark federal funds rate by 25 basis points in March and have since telegraphed that steeper, 50-point rate hikes are “on the table” at upcoming meetings, beginning in May. 

The new challenges have prompted economists to downgrade their expectations for the year. The International Monetary Fund said in its latest World Economic Outlook that global domestic gross product will grow by 3.6% this year, a 0.8 percentage point drop from its January estimate. 

Fed Chairman Jerome Powell has pushed back against concern that further tightening by the central bank will trigger a recession and has maintained optimism that the Fed can strike a delicate balance between taming inflation without crushing the economy. 

Still, he acknowledged the difficulty of the task ahead and said it is “absolutely essential” for central bankers to restore price stability. 

“Our goal is to use our tools to get demand and supply back in sync, so inflation moves back into place, without a slowdown that amounts to a recession,” Powell said during a recent panel discussion with the IMF and the World Bank. “I don’t think you’ll hear anyone at the Fed say that’s straightforward and easy. It’s going to be challenging.”

REPORT: 33-Year-Old Mother Paralyzed Following COVID Jab

REPORT: 33-Year-Old Mother Paralyzed Following COVID Jab

Another day, another tragedy. It’s become an all-too-familiar story by now.

Her doctor, her government and the mainstream media – all assured her it would be OK, and that the new experimental mRNA synthetic pharmaceutical cocktail was ‘safe and effective.’ In a mere moment, her entire life turned on a dime.

Just 12 hours after receiving her experimental COVID-19 gene therapy injection manufactured by Pfizer, 33-year-old mother Rachel Cecere’s body began rebelling against her, and she was later diagnosed with “acute distress to the nervous system.” Rachel found herself paralyzed from the neck down, but three weeks later she was able to regain strength in her upper body, except for her left hand.

The timing of the onset of her disease just after receiving the experimental ‘vaccine’ is suspect to say the least. Was her disability brought on by the jab? If so, who will be held accountable?

She is not alone either. To date the various vaccine adverse reactions databases in the US, UK, and EU alone contain, on the aggregate, millions of reported injuries, as well as tens of thousands of deaths following the experimental shot.

She asks in desperation, “When is this going to get better?” Watch: 

This video was published at Odysee on February 2, 2022

READ MORE VACCINE NEWS AT: 21st Century Wire Vaccine Files



Biden’s DHS Confirms Plans to Siphon Healthcare Services Away from Veterans to Illegal Aliens at Border

Biden’s DHS Confirms Plans to Siphon Healthcare Services Away from Veterans to Illegal Aliens at Border

This is lower than low. Just look at the smug look on that scumbag’s face. He needs to locked up NOW!!

CBP/Mani Albrecht/Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images
CBP/Mani Albrecht/Kevin Dietsch/Getty Im

President Joe Biden’s Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has seemingly confirmed plans to siphon healthcare services away from American veterans treated at Veterans Affairs (VA) to illegal aliens arriving at the United States-Mexico border.

During a hearing before the House Homeland Security Committee on Wednesday, DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas confirmed to Rep. Ashley Hinson (R-IA) that the Biden administration is in talks with VA officials to potentially transfer doctors and nurses to the southern border to treat illegal aliens arriving every day in record-breaking numbers.

“Is the department planning to reallocate resources, doctors and nurses, from our VA system intended to care for our veterans to illegal immigrants at our southern border?” Hinson asked.

Mayorkas responded, stating that “the resources that the medical personnel from the Veterans Administration would allocate to this effort is under the judgment of the secretary of Veterans Affairs, who prioritizes the interests of veterans above all others for very noble and correct.”

When Hinson asked if Mayorkas had any conversations about the plan, he responded, “I have not personally, but of course, our teams, our personnel have. and I’d be very pleased to follow up with you.”

The remarks come as Sen. Josh Hawley (R-MO) had sought clarification on reports that the Biden administration was looking to siphon doctors and nurses away from the VA toward illegal aliens at the border.

“In the words of one [Customs and Border Protection] official, ‘We’re going to take medical services away from people that really deserve that, who went to combat … to give free medical attention to illegal migrants,’” Hawley wrote in a letter to Mayorkas.

Already, Americans are forced to subsidize medical care for illegal aliens to the tune of $18.5 billion annually. Last year alone, Americans footed the bill for more than $316 million in medical care for border crossers and illegal aliens who were detained in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) custody.

John Binder is a reporter for Breitbart News.

Email him at jbinder@breitbart.com. Follow him on Twitter here.

Biden requests $33B from Congress in Ukraine aid! Where does the gravy train end???

Biden requests $33B from Congress in Ukraine aid

President Joe Biden speaks as he meets with small business owners in the South Court Auditorium on the White House complex in Washington, Thursday, April 28, 2022. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)
OAN Newsroom
UPDATED 12:00 PM PT – Thursday, April 28, 2022

President Joe Biden said he’s sending Congress a request for more security and humanitarian funding for Ukraine. During a press conference at the White House Thursday, Biden said in total he’s asking for an additional $33 billion for the war-torn country as the conflict continues for more than two months.

Twenty billion dollars will be used for military assistance, $8 billion for economic assistance and $3 billion for humanitarian aid, which is expected to last through September 30. The President stressed the aid will help Ukraine continue defending it’s sovereignty against Russian aggression.

“Basically, we’re out of money and so that’s why today, in order to sustain Ukraine as it continues to fight, I’m sending Congress a supplemental budget request, ” Biden stateted. “It’s going to keep weapons and ammunition flowing without interruption to the brave Ukrainian fighters, and continue delivering economic humanitarian assistance to the Ukrainian people.”

Biden also is sending a proposal to Congress to use funds from seized assets of Russian oligarchs to help Ukraine fight Vladimir Putin’s invasion.

Biden Regime Gets Creepier: DHS Sec. Mayorkas Announces New ‘Disinformation Governance Board’

Nick Kangadis | April 28, 2022

Leave it to the Biden regime to create a “Board” that the fictional “Ministry of Magic’s” Delores Umbridge would be jealous of. Look it up. You’ll get the comparison.

On Wednesday, Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Alejandro Mayorkas testified in front of the House Appropriations Subcommittee to talk about the 2023 budget. In doing so, Mayorkas revealed that the Biden regime’s DHS created a “‘Disinformation Governance Board’ to combat misinformation ahead of the 2022 midterms,” according to Fox News.

Because of course they are. I’m sure that’ll be completely ethical.

The person reportedly tasked with being the executive director of Big Brother — ahem, excuse me — the “Disinformation Governance Board” will be alleged Russian disinformation expert Nina Jankowicz.

Related: CensorTrack: Big Tech Protects Biden’s Reputation 646 Times!

The Daily Mail reported the following about Jankowicz:

  • Jankowicz has previously questioned the validity of Hunter Biden’s laptop, calling it ‘a Trump campaign product’
  • She also told NPR last week that she ‘shudders to think about’ more free speech on social media platforms after Elon Musk bought Twitter

“Now that I’ve got it: a HUGE focus of our work, and indeed, one of the key reasons the Board was established, is to maintain the Dept’s committment to protecting free speech, privacy, civil rights, & civil liberties,” Jankowicz tweeted on Wednesday.


So she wants to commit “to protecting free speech, privacy, civil rights, & civil liberties” by limiting what people can say after being the arbiter of what is or isn’t “disinformation.”

No possibility for corruption there. Sorry for not having confidence in someone who was previously a disinformation fellow at a center named after possibly the worst president in the history of the U.S., Woodrow Wilson.

Maybe I’m reading too much into that, but call me crazy for not having faith in another unelected bureaucrat who specializes in finding ways to squelch free speech.

Related MRCTV Twitter Video:


Wikipedia deletes entry for Hunter Biden investment firm Rosemont Seneca Partners

Wikipedia deletes entry for Hunter Biden investment firm Rosemont Seneca Partners


Jon Levine

April 23, 2022 9:14am 


Wikipedia removed an article on Hunter Biden's investment firm Rosemont Seneca Partners.

Wikipedia removed an article on Hunter Biden’s investment firm Rosemont Seneca Partners.Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Devon Archer founded Rosemont Seneca Partners with Biden and Chris Heinz.
The original entry for Rosemont Seneca Partners in Wikipedia.
A Wikipedia editor claimed the article is could be "a magnet for conspiracy theories about Hunter Biden."

Wikipedia editors removed the entry for Rosemont Seneca Partners earlier this week on the ground that it was “not notable,” archived comments from its Talk Page reveal. 

The deletion happened Wednesday. The investment company co-founded by Hunter Biden has been at the heart of numerous questions surrounding his overseas business dealings

“This organization is only mentioned in connection with its famous founders, Hunter Biden and Christopher Heinz,” said a Wiki editor identified only as Alex who additionally warned that “keeping it around” ran the risk of the page becoming “a magnet for conspiracy theories about Hunter Biden.”

Arguments to merge the story with Hunter Biden’s official wikipedia page were also overruled.

The brief article was thin on details and in bad need of an overhaul, but did provide information about the company’s founding by Hunter Biden, Devon Archer and Chris Heinz. Devon Archer founded Rosemont Seneca Partners with Biden and Chris Heinz.Alec Tabak for NY Post

Wikipedia has tilted so far left in recent years that its co-founder Larry Sanger now says the site can not longer be trusted and has become “propaganda.” 

“There’s a very big, nasty, complex game being played behind the scenes to make the article say what somebody wants them to say,” Sanger said last year.

Activist editors on the site have long tried to delete an entry for ‘Mass killings under communist regimes’ — though for now it remains online. The original entry for Rosemont Seneca Partners in Wikipedia.WikipediaA Wikipedia editor claimed the article is could be “a magnet for conspiracy theories about Hunter Biden.”Wikipedia

Critics said the Rosemont decision showed a double standard.

“If a Trump-linked company had its Wikipedia page wiped or one from the Russia probe, it’s more than a safe bet to say that CNN would be dedicating multiple reporters to following the internet trail,” said Curtis Houck, Managing Editor of the Media Research Center told The Post.

MORE ON: HUNTER BIDEN from The New York Post

Eugenics, Infertility & Population Growth CRISIS- Part 4

Eugenics, Infertility & Population Growth CRISIS Part 4

July 11, 2019 / 2 Comments

us population growth decline
us immigration increase
population growth united states
georgia guidestones
US fertility rate decline
teenager sex trend
emergency contraception morning after pill increase of use
birth rate data since the 1970s
australia birth rate
colombia birth rate decline
dominican republic birth rate decline
hungary birth rate decline
india birth rate decline
indonesia birth rate decline
ireland birth rate decline
kenya birth rate decline
mexico birth rate decline
saudi arabia birth rate decline
Thailand birth rate decline
US birth rate decline
world fertility rate decline
NY vaccine law threatens to call CPS on parents

Eugenics is all about controlling the population. This is not a lost art – it is an evolved art that they have perfected. The U.S. population growth hit a historic 80-year low last year and the entire world population growth is on a downward spiral, particularly in western countries. This is due to a decrease in the number of births and an increase in the number of deaths, along with an infertility crisis. How did this happen?

• While the birth rate is declining, infertility is rapidly rising, immigration is climbing to be the “new replacement population” for the U.S. which has been projected to tip the scales after 2030.

• The U.S. birth rate has fallen to the lowest in 30 years, and men’s sperm count has reduced by 50% over the past 40 years in western countries.

• There is a direct link between the HPV vaccine and infertility rates, and since 1991 the birth rate for teenagers has declined 67%.

READ Parts 1–3 first:

Part 1: Eugenics, Infertility & Population Growth Crisis (extensive historical timeline)

Part 2: The Rockefeller Foundation’s Plan to Sterilize Through Anti-fertility Vaccines & Crops

Part 3: DNA Collection and Biotechnology Companies

Population Control on Multiple Fronts

Between 2000–2018 there has been a significant decrease in natural population in the U.S. The “natural increase” on the chart below indicates the number of births minus the number of deaths. Meanwhile, immigration is on the rise and is projected to be the primarycontributor to national population growth after 2030 as natural increase continues to decline.

Between 2010 and 2018 the population of those under the age of 18 declined by 780,000 (1%), while the adult population grew by 19.2 million (8%). The child population declined in 29 states. Nearly one-fifth of all states lost population in recent years. Notice the states with the population growth in 2017-2018 directly pertain to immigration. All of this is indicative of a growing older population that is going to need to be cared for. Additionally, most sources reporting on this are stating that immigration is “vitally important” because it will be the future contributor to America’s growing society and economy.

President Donald Trump just suggested last week that he wants to delay the 2020 census following a Supreme Court ruling that its form cannot include a question about citizenship until they justify the change in Census Bureau practice. People go door to door asking specific personal questions about the individuals residing in each home in this country, yet there is a dispute over being able to ask people if they are citizens of this country. Ask yourself why. They most certainly do not want a count on the number of undocumented immigrants living in this country.

“Seems totally ridiculous that our government, and indeed Country, cannot ask a basic question of Citizenship in a very expensive, detailed and important Census, in this case for 2020,” the president tweeted after the decision.

For years all we’ve heard is how overpopulated we are and how population control is necessary. All the while, there have been declines on every front – all tied into the agendas of those wishing to create a one world, socialist agenda – a melting pot, with the same rules, same playbook, and controlling figures.

Hillary Clinton’s former campaign chair and counselor to former president Barack Obama, John Podesta believes that climate change is really about women’s rights. Come again? Just last year he stressed his concern over the burden to the environment due to “population growth.” Perhaps he missed the data on fertility, birth rate, and population growth over the past two decades? Basically, his op-ed in the Washington Post is a rambling about how the United Nations has committed to universal access to sexual and reproductive health care as part of the 2015 Sustainable Development Goals. He also felt it important to share that “new data from the United Nations found that if girls in the developing world all received secondary education, we would see a 42% decline in the fertility rate.” See that – they don’t hide their agenda, they just disguise it with trying to confuse people into believing that we are all going to die by 2030 if we don’t stop having babies, because the “climate changes” are going to swallow us whole. Fear tactics.

Georgia Guidestones

Let us not forget, the bizarre Georgia Guidestones – a monument erected in 1980 in Elbert County, Georgia – consisting of 10 guidelines inscribed in eight modern languages. The story goes: in 1979 a man by the “pseudonym” Robert C. Christian had a granite finishing company produce them for a group of “anonymous loyal Americans” that had been planning this for 20 years, and wished to remain anonymous. He instructed them to inscribe the following message on the 19’ stone slabs, in English, Spanish, Swahili, Hindi, Hebrew, Arabic, Traditional Chinese, and Russian, and the slabs were all to be erected in a very specific manner based around astronomy.

• Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
• Guide reproduction wisely — improving fitness and diversity.
• Unite humanity with a living new language.
• Rule passion — faith — tradition — and all things with tempered reason.
• Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
• Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
• Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
• Balance personal rights with social duties.
• Prize truth — beauty — love — seeking harmony with the infinite.
• Be not a cancer on the earth — Leave room for nature — Leave room for nature.

Whereas most would probably agree with some of these statements, there are obvious ones that are disconcerting. The irony is the sentence written in Wikipedia: “The anonymity of the guidestones’ authors and their apparent advocacy for population control, eugenics and internationalism have made them a target for controversy and “conspiracy theory.”

This is a perfect example of perpetuating the term “conspiracy theory,” when that sentence could have concluded with “controversy.” The conspiracy is quite evident. Enough said.

Birth, Fertility, and Abortion Rates

The U.S. birth rate has fallen to the lowest level in 32 years. Brady Hamilton, a statistician and demographer at the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics reported that the total number of births in 2018 was down 2% from 2017 and that the general fertility is also at a record low. This is lower than after the Great Depression, and is nowhere near enough for the population to reproduce itself.

The CDC offers no explanation as to why birth rates are declining, and this same pattern is happening in many developed countries, according to Dr. John W. Row, a professor at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health. As a result of this decline, Rowe said “Long term it means we’re going to have an increasing proportion of older people. All the projections about what percent of the population will be elderly in 5, 10, 20 years from now were made with the assumption that the birth rate would be stable.”

A study by the Guttmacher Institute found that “accidental pregnancies” have fallen by 18% in recent years, the lowest level in 30 years being between 2008 and 2011. “We suggest that the decline is likely due to increases in the use of contraception,” the Guttmacher Institute said in a statement. Their report showed declines among women of all ages, incomes, race, and ethnicity groups. The use of IUDs tripled between 2007 and 2012. 

The abortion rate declined to the lowest level in 10 years due to a significant decline in unintended pregnancies and contraception, access to abortion providers, shifts in economy and childbearing desires. The largest decline was seen in the rate of abortions between those aged 15-19, which fell 54%. According to a 2017 report on “Sexual Activity and Contraceptive use Among Teenagers in the United States: 2011-2015,” by the National Center for Health Statistics, condoms (97%) remained the most commonly used birth control method, followed by withdrawal (60%) and the pill (56%). Of those 4,134 male and females teens that were questioned in this study, only 42% of the females and 44% of the males had actually had sex, while the others had abstained. 

With all of this said, let’s put this in perspective: 

The trend in teenagers having sexual intercourse between the ages of 15-19, from 2002–2015 is the difference of a 4% drop in females, and a 2% drop in males. 

The use of contraception among females between 2002–2015 has increased 3% with condoms, 5% with withdrawal, a 2% increase with implants, and a big increase of 15% with emergency contraception, otherwise known as “the morning after pill.” On the flipside, there is a 4% decrease in Depo-Provera (the pill). It’s important to note that “the morning after pill” was first approved by the FDA in 1998. 

So we have teenagers that are just as sexually active as they’ve been since 2002, a slight increase in condom use and the unsafe method of withdrawal, and a sizeable increase in the morning after pill, while decreasing the daily pill. Taking all of this into account, does the 15% increase in the use of the morning after pill account for the “record low” teenage birth rate, which fell 7% in 2018 compared to 2017? In looking at all of these numbers, how does this account for the significant decrease of 54% in abortions in teenagers aged 15-19? Is it possible they are unable to become pregnant? Since 1991, the birthrate for teenagers has declined 67%. Though CDC statistics report percentages of infertility for various age groups, they are basing this on a very small sampling, just as in the survey above, which only accounted for 4,134 teenagers. Yet, abortion facilities should have their numbers well documented, which brought them to the conclusion of a 54% reduction with teenage abortions.

The overall increase in the use of the “morning after pill” between women ages 15–44 is quite significant. From 2002 to 2015, there has been an 18% increase is use.

Between 1973, when abortion was legalized, and 2014, there have been 60,942,033 abortions in the U.S.

How important is “family planning” to Bill & Melinda Gates? The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has paid out over $34 million to Clinton Health Access Initiative, Inc. in the name of “family planning,” since 2014. They have given millions upon millions to several other Clinton “initiatives” throughout the years as well. To date, they have funded Planned Parenthood over $81 million for “family planning,” and that doesn’t include the $28 million they gave to them via the Global Fund. This doesn’t even begin to touch on the millions – likely billions – they have given to population councils and numerous other “family planning” groups.

Bill Gates explains his theory of lowering the population in this TedTalk 2010 appearance (at 4:15 in), stating that the population needs to be lowered…. “Now if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%.”

What About Men’s Fertility Rate?

On April 29, 2019 Tucker Carlson had Dr. Hagai Levine on his show to discuss the alarming decline in male sperm count in men in the west, which has fallen over 50% in the last 40 years. That is astronomical! Despite the numbers rapidly declining in recent years, scientists don’t seem to be studying the reasons why, and no one would appear to be reporting on this, aside from Tucker. When Tucker asked Dr. Levine what he believed could be the source of this, Levine reiterated that they haven’t studied it enough, but that they do knowchemicals and pesticides definitely effect sperm. Reuters covered this in an article as well, stating that sperm counts in men from America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand have dropped by more than 50 percent in less than 40 years. This raises the question – why aren’t scientists studying this, and why aren’t the multitude of “population” agencies concerned about this? Why is no one talking about it? 

The Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Vaccine Connection to Infertility

The Children’s Health Defense did a fantastic report in November 2018 regarding a link between the HPV vaccine and soaring infertility. They began with covering the facts about the increasing rates of infertility across the globe. Aside from the United States reporting the lowest birth rate in 30 years, despite its economic boom, Finland’s birth rate is the lowest in 150 years, Denmark and Poland are running campaigns encouraging couples to breed, and Russia has introduced a string of reforms. The list also includes the United Kingdom, France, Italy, Japan, and Australia. What they don’t mention in this report – is the obvious – coinciding with this rapid decline, immigrants are being flown, bussed, and boated into nearly all of these locations to fill this void. Coincidence?

While the media and big power players have all carried on endlessly about the need for population control due to “overpopulation,” the reality is, it was already being controlled and decreased. It just wasn’t being talked about.

The CDC reports that one in eight women have trouble conceiving and bearing a child. Surely it doesn’t help that male sperm count is down 50%. Another staggering figure, that doesn’t happen to be mentioned in this report, is that the maternal mortality rate for women in the US has increased by 26.6% from 2000 to 2014. While congress got together in 2018 to gather millions in determining what is causing the maternal mortality rate to increase, nothing is being done about researching why there is a huge increase in infertility in this country. Why is that? Well, despite the large increase, it still only accounts for 700 women a year that die as a result of pregnancy or delivery complications. Whereas there were 3,853,472 babies born in 2017 versus 3,941,109 born in 2016. That’s a difference of 87,637 with a continued decline in the birth rate each year, but this number isn’t important. Ask yourself why.

The Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health released a study that looked at a database of eight million American women and found a 25 percent increase in childlessness associated with the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine, in tandem with a marked decline in fecundity. Despite this, no one in the medical profession or media is talking about it or seemingly doing anything about it, being as the vaccine is still being pushed, and some states are trying to add it to the mandatory vaccine schedule for children. Of course, Merck and GSK are the manufacturers. We know how this all turned out in India and with the 200 victims in the U.S., as documented in part 1 of the eugenics timeline. The CDC went on to claim they are still “safe.”

The HPV vaccine was approved by the FDA in 2006 to prevent cervical cancer that only 0.6% of women face, yet they have heavily pushed the HPV vaccine globally, and are now trying to make it mandatory in some states. Scientists and health agencies have ignored the documented toxicity to reproductive organs. They have brushed off 45,277 reports of adverse events. 

Read the full report and documentation on the HPV vaccine situation here.

A Sampling of Global Statistics on Birth Rate Declines:

World Fertility Rate Decline:

Notice anything interesting with most of these charts? There seems to be a big dip between 2009–2010. Something to note.

This was just a small sampling of all of the reports available. Not every country in the world is in a decline, as there are some that have plateaued such as Canada and the United Kingdom, and a handful that have slightly increased such as Sweden, Switzerland and Ukraine, but most are on a decline. Nearly all of the islands along the Caribbean that the Clintons, Gates, Soros, Branson, and others are working with for their “tourism” and “climate change” agendas – have all seen a significant decline in birth rates as well.

What Does All of This Explain?

One might say, “but how does any of the above have anything to do with eugenics or those in a position of power trying to control the population?” Simple: By pushing “the morning after pill,” which has gained an enormous amount of traction, they are reducing the birth rate. This is intentional. By pushing abortions, and extending them to full-term abortions, they are reducing the birth rate. This is intentional. By attempting to scare young adults into not reproducing due to climate change or the overpopulation farce, they are controlling a narrative that some young adults are buying into. This is intentional. By spending decades pushing “gender equality” and “equal rights for women” and the pink-hat-wearing feminists that don’t even know what they are fighting for – they have been striving for women to work instead of being homemakers and raising a family, hence no babies. This is intentional. By pushing taking the morning after pill or getting abortions through commercials, tv shows, and movies, this is normalizing it. This is intentional. By pushing for mass immigration, while disregarding the health and well-being of the elderly, homeless, and veterans, it is increasing the flow of immigration and potential disease and further crime, while also increasing the death rate due to negligence. This is all intentional.

By forcing mandated vaccinations, it is causing higher levels of both children and adults to become sick, autistic, paralyzed, sterilized, and in some cases death. This is all very well documented. If one doubts this, ask yourself, why did the government payout $4.1 billion in injury and death claims since 1988? Just for kicks? Why did they only vaccinate millions of females in Kenya, causing them to be sterilized? If one doubts that these mandates are being misconstrued as “forced,” take a look at the letter from the department of education sent out to parents and guardians of a school in New York. They will send Child Protective Services (CPS) after you, if you do not comply. That’s about the worst threat a parent can receive, given their horrific background with needlessly pulling children out of homes and placing them in foster care, which is the number one hotspot for children being trafficked in the US. Just this week, another school sent out the same threat.

Still fooled by the CPS system? There are thousands of cases you can research on your own. Look into CPS medical kidnapping, for starters. One case just concluded this week, where a California woman’s infant son was taken by CPS and given a full body medical test, along with 13 vaccines without a warrant or parental consent. This is a story everyone should read to see just how CPS can take your child with little to no reason. The mother just won a lawsuit in this case, but most parents aren’t that fortunate, and sadly, her child has been dosed with 13 vaccines.

This sort of thing is happening across the globe, not just in the United States. Italy just arrested18 people including a mayor, doctors and social workers for allegedly brainwashing vulnerable children into thinking their parents had abused them. They did this to sell them to foster parents, then proceeded to hide any gifts and letters that were sent by the real parents. Some of these foster parents have been accused of sexually abusing the children they paid for. These are NESTS, and they are everywhere. People in power positions, that most would trust, are the ones behind these nests. Why is this relevant here? Because it’s part of the overall equation. Understand those in positions of power, recognize their motives, and be vigilant. They are not always who they say they are, and oftentimes their intentions are the opposite of what they project.

Click Here for Part 5 of 6 – GMOs, Big Tech & Geoengineering’s Role in Eugenics

Download this full 6-part report in PDF format from the Bookshop. >

abortioneugenicsGeorgia GuidestonesHPV vaccineImmigrationinfertilitymandatory vaccinesPlanned Parenthoodpopulation controlBy Corey Lynn


Corey Lynn is an investigative journalist. Support her work by becoming a Patron or making a donation. Follow her at coreysdigs.com, on Gab, GabTV, and YouTube.

Eugenics, Infertility & Population Growth CRISIS- Part 3

Eugenics, Infertility & Population Growth CRISIS- Part 3

July 9, 2019 / 2 Comments

Since the dawn of eugenics, they’ve tried to trace the pedigree and traits of human beings so as to control the masses. Through DNA, they have not only accomplished this, they have extended a branch to the population to show off their ancestral trees. Much like in the days of pedigree fairs, people had no idea what they were signing up for.

• Bill Gates funded scientists to study 40,000 DNA samples from 23andMe and assessed genes having to do with preterm labor and God knows what else.

• Billionaires, government and big pharma are investing in biotechnology companies that transform cells and rewrite DNA, amassing the world’s largest stores of “usable” designer genetic code.

• 30 million Americans have already voluntarily submitted their DNA to the likes of 23andMe, Ancestry, MyHeritage, Genomelink and several others.

READ Parts 1 & 2 first:

Part 1: Eugenics, Infertility & Population Growth Crisis (extensive historical timeline)

Part 2: The Rockefeller Foundation’s Plan to Sterilize Through Anti-fertility Vaccines & Crops

DNA Database Collection – A Scientists Dream

The history of eugenics, published in the eugenics archive, explains that eugenics researchers had attempted to trace the inheritance of a trait through a family tree, or pedigree, by analyzing their genetics. However, at that time they were not aware that DNA was the molecule of heredity. Today, they use these DNA “markers” to follow trait inheritance. Back in the early 1900s they had to conduct interviews on medical histories, which were submitted to the Eugenics Record Office in New York, where they stored documentation on family genealogy with traits and medical conditions.

Eugenicists, mostly known as “philanthropists” in this day and age, spent decades compiling information on populations, under the guise of “medical records.” From the moment you step into a doctor’s office, you are briskly filling out forms, describing yours and your families entire health background. From school forms to maternal databases, the Electronic Health Records (EHR) put in place by Barack Obama, and the mandatory diabetes registry Thomas Frieden established in New York, the number of databases collecting data on every individual – is frankly, off the charts. Rest assured, whatever isn’t collected directly from you, is being collected by big tech, all the way down to what road you are driving down to what pair of underwear you purchased online yesterday. There is a reason for all of this data collection. What communities are the poorest? What people are carrying diseases or deformities? What’s everyone’s race? But indeed, it didn’t stop there. They needed more – they wanted your DNA.

In years that followed, biotech companies sprouted up, DNA databases were growing wings, and genetic testing services became wildly popular, as the naïve began submitting their saliva samples to learn about their ancestry and personal traits. Don’t feel bad if you were one of the “naïve,” – while you were doling out your privacy, they were duping millions of other Americans as well. Little did everyone know that all of this data is being stored, bloodlines are being documented, genetic markers traced, scientists are analyzing it, and law enforcement is using it in conjunction with their national database because it provides more specific markers. Sure, solving a cold case file on a murderer is fantastic news, and curing cancer would be phenomenal if they were ever to release the cure, but what else might they be compiling all of this data for? 

For those claiming “tinfoil hat,” here’s a quick lesson in how capitalism works. You don’t give away the farm for free unless you are getting something spectacular in return. Ask yourself – why do they want all of this data? Are they looking to heal the world OR shape the world? 

Companies such as 23andMe, Ancestry, MyHeritage, Genomelink, Promethease, Lifenome, GEDmatch, Family Tree DNA, and numerous others have flooded the market, enticing people to submit their saliva samples for FREE testing and extraordinary information on their heritage, traits, and health. Isn’t that sublime? And, they’ve become such a hit, that many of them have setup affiliate marketing so that others can promote this wonderful service of collecting your genetics.

For example, Genomelink tells you that you should “go beyond genealogy and health risk to discover how DNA shapes aspects of your daily life that you care about. Instant access to 25 trait reports upon uploading your raw data, with 100+ total trait reports available.” What can you learn about yourself, or shall we say… what will they learn about you? According to their website, they can assess your intelligence, personality, physical traits, and even food & nutrition. Isn’t that something? They don’t gloat about the fact that they can also trace your genealogy, while telling you how “intelligent” you may be. Genomelink is very excited about the fact that almost 30 million Americans have already been tested in the Unites States alone.

If you sign up with Lifenome, you will receive a comprehensive analysis of your DNA on nutrition, fitness, skincare, allergy and personality. Its’ wonderful AI+Genomics engine can assess the cumulative effect of multiple genetic variants that may just have an impact on your wellness. 

In Bill and Melinda Gates 2019 annual letter, titled ‘We Didn’t See This Coming,’ they talk about at-home DNA tests under “Surprise #2.” The Gates Foundation helped fund a 23andMe study, whereby scientists reviewed more than 40,000 samples and discovered a potential link between preterm labor and six genes – including one that regulates how the body uses the mineral selenium. Apparently, some people have a gene that doesn’t allow them to process selenium properly. Therefore, mothers who carry that gene are more likely to give birth early, suggesting selenium plays a factor in when a woman begins labor. While their researchers work on breakthroughs for this, a team at Stanford is developing a blood test that can determine how soon a woman will give birth. 

The Gates are essentially funding and running the worldwide vaccine industry, which is causing a great deal of injury – in some cases permanent, causing infertility, and even death, with a very good chance that it is also increasing the child mortality rate in developing countries. So why not “invest” in cures for child mortality as well? Oh, but they have. In fact, just this month they gave another $180 million to CHAMPS, a global health network headquartered in the Emory Global Health Institute. That brings their investment in CHAMPS up to $271 million to date.

While all of these services purport ways of helping you to become the best “you” possible, they are cataloging terabytes of personal data, family history, ancestry, intelligence, medical markers, and a myriad of other traits. Scientists everywhere are having the time of their lives. Some want this data so bad, they are willing to offer this DNA collecting service for free, and of course for those that charge, you can easily find these kits at your local Walgreens or online at Amazon.

Food for thought for the next time you see an ad for “find out all about your ancestry!” – while we collect your DNA.

Biotech Companies Flourish

From biotechnology to genomes and genetics, it’s been all the buzz for scientists, philanthropists, and the wealthy. Companies have sprung up everywhere since the last 70s, just a few years after the sterilization law was repealed. Genetech was the first publicly traded biotech company in 1980.

For six billionaires, their intrigue continued to grow, along with their investments. Bill Gates, Jeff Bezos, Richard Branson, Michael Bloomberg, Peter Theil, and Walt Disney’s great-nephew Tim Disney have all invested in various biotech companies over the past few years. In fact, according to Family Capital’s estimate, roughly 20% of investments done by family offices goes into biotech or related industries. Investments in synthetic biology start-ups has increased from $374 million in 2012 to $1.2 billion in 2016, according to data from CB insights.

What is biotech exactly? It is the exploitation of biological processes for industrial and other purposes, especially the genetic manipulation of microorganisms for the production of antibiotics, hormones, and “other such needs.” According to Forbes, these are the top tenbiotech companies in the U.S., but rest assured, there are plenty more out there, and some of these have global locations.

Bill Gates for example, invested $275 million into Ginko Bioworks, which is a company that designs custom microbes that could one day be used to build living things out of nothing. How do they achieve this? They use “genetic engineering to design and print new DNA for a variety of organisms – from plants to bacteria – that can then be used for anything from killing antibiotic-resistant germs to producing artificial sweetener and cheaper perfume.” They reprogram the DNA of plants and other organisms. Even Bayer jumped on board for a cool $100 million investment into Ginko.

Ginko Bioworks also works with the US Department of Defense to custom-design bacteria for probiotics that can treat antibiotic-resistant germs. In fact, they survived off of government research grants after MIT scientists created the company in 2009, which allowed them to build the automated tools they needed to collect genetic information from organisms, transform cells and rewrite DNA. As of 2018, they were on target to amass one of the world’s largest stores of “usable” designer genetic code, as their computers print their own DNA.

Ginko Bioworks is one of numerous biotechcompanies that Bill Gates invests in. He’s also involved with the fertilizer industry, lab grown meatvaccines, big pharma, climate change and sustainabilityreproductive health, population control, creating a global network of hospitalsand clinics in Africa and other countries, and countless other endeavors that have a direct impact on human lives. Gates also started “The Giving Pledge,” whereby 204 of the wealthiest individuals in the world, from 23 countries, are pooling their money into “philanthropic” adventures across the globe. Some of its members are Michael Bloomberg, Richard Branson, Edgar Bronfman, Warren Buffet, Victor Pinchuk, Ted Turner, and Mark Zuckerberg just to name a few. The man has his finger on the pulse of nearly every health-related industry that makes decisions about what humans consume, ingest, inject, and are exposed to.

DNA and genetics are the name of the game. How do these tie into vaccines, GMOs, and even Planned Parenthood? Speaking of Planned Parenthood, Gates ties to Planned Parenthood go beyond the Global Fund. In 2003, Bill Moyers interviewed Bill Gates, on the PBS show “NOW with Bill Moyers”, in a special 60-minute episode titled, “Health, Wealth and Bill Gates.” Here is the complete transcript. In this interview Bill Gates stated:

When I was growing up, my parents were always involved in various volunteer things. My dad was head of Planned Parenthood. And it was very controversial to be involved with that. And so, it’s fascinating. At the dinner table my parents are very good at sharing the things that they were doing. And almost treating us like adults, talking about that.

My mom was on the United Way group that decides how to allocate the money and looks at all the different charities and makes the very hard decisions about where that pool of funds is going to go. So, I always knew there was something about really educating people and giving them choices in terms of family size.

“Gene Therapy” via Vaccines is on The Brink of Human Trials:

In 2015 Scripps Research developed an artificial antibody to inactivate the HIV virus. “By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.” They are testing it on Ebola, Malaria, Influenza and Hepatitis as well. The first human trial, called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer (I.G.T.) is underway and several new ones are planned. Chief scientific officer at Sanofi stated, “It could revolutionize the way we immunize against public health threats in the future.” The synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.

Coincidentally, 35 ambassadors from other countries just visited Scripps Research Institute on June 17, 2019 while on a State Department Tour. According to their press release, “the visit was intended to build relationships between the ambassadors and San Diego’s biotech companies, nonprofit and academic institutes, and leaders, and in the process open doors for local organizations eager to develop global partnerships and investment possibilities.”

In a 2015 Scripps press release, they announced the nearly $6 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation that they were awarded for this revolutionary vaccine development. Over the past five years, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has given $174 million in grants to Scripps.

In 2017 Scripps Department of Immunology and Microbiology on the Florida campus of the Scripps Research Institute received $4.8 millionfrom the National Institutes of Health to support a five-year project to bring gene therapy immunizations, beginning with an HIV vaccine, closer to human clinical trials

Are all of these biotech companies and “philanthropists” trying to heal the world OR shape the world?

Click Here for Part 4 of 6 – Population Control on Multiple Fronts (you do not want to miss this one!)

Download this full 6-part report in PDF format from the Bookshop. >

Creepy: Biden Goes “Off Script” To Tell Teachers That Kids Are “Yours When You’re In The Classroom”

Creepy: Biden Goes “Off Script” To Tell Teachers That Kids Are “Yours When You’re In The Classroom”

While speaking at a White House event for National and State Teachers of the Year, Joe Biden told those gathered that children don’t belong to parents when they are in the classroom, and instead are the property of teachers.


Biden addressed recent efforts in Florida and elsewhere to keep sexualisation, gender theory and critical race theory out of classrooms, declaring that teachers should not be “the target of the culture wars.”

Before he went on to make the creepy comments, Biden admitted that he ‘wasn’t supposed to be speaking’ and was going “off script” much to the concern of his staff:

Biden AGAIN repeated a made up story about “teaching” as a “professor” at the University of Pennsylvania, which never happened, as well as changing his never ending story on why he went into politics, before his brain finally froze up and he just began talking complete gibberish:

Eugenics, Infertility & Population Growth CRISIS- Part 2

Eugenics, Infertility & Population Growth- CRISIS Part 2

July 5, 2019 / 4 Comments

The Rockefellers were just getting started with their eugenics plan back in the early 1900s, and by the time the 1960s rolled around, they were full steam ahead with their population control agenda – including the development of anti-fertility vaccines for both men and women.  

• In 1968 the Rockefeller Foundation stated that the oral pill and IUD will turn out to be impracticable on a mass scale. They set out to fix that.

 • In their 1986 annual report they admitfunding research into the use of fertility-reducing compounds in relation to food for “widespread use.”

• By 1988 they were funding the first phase of anti-fertility vaccines for women.

• In 1991 a “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation” was created with the Rockefeller Foundation, WHO, World Bank and UN Population Fund. Mind you, this is 20 years after sterilization laws were repealed.

READ ‘Eugenics, Anti-fertility & Population Growth Crisis’ Part 1 first, as it covers the extensive historical timeline leading up to these critical events.

The Rockefeller Foundation’s Plan to Sterilize Through Anti-fertility Vaccines & Crops

In a brilliant report by journalist Jurriaan Maessen, he compiled and connected critical data pertaining to the Rockefeller’s anti-fertility plans. Some of the source links were removed, so I have reviewed all of the content, traced the annual reports, uploaded them, and linked them accordingly below – in addition to adding some other findings. I highly recommend reviewing the full, extensive report. Below are some key highlights.

In a 1968 Report by the Rockefeller Foundation on ‘Problems of Population,’ it definitively states:

Experience of the past few years indicates that the oral pill and the IUD, while far superior in many respects to contraceptive methods available previously, have serious drawbacks that limit their effectiveness. We are faced with the danger that within a few years these two ‘modern’ methods, for which such high hopes have been held, will in fact turn out to be impracticable on a mass scale. It is clear that major improvements in contraceptive methodology are required.

The male pill is being very little investigated; several types of drugs are known to diminish male fertility, but those that have been tested have serious problems of toxicity. Very little work is in progress on immunological methods, such as vaccines, to reduce fertility, and much more research is required if a solution is to be found here.

The foundation will endeavor to assist in filling this important gap in several ways:

1) “Seeking out or encouraging the development of, and providing partial support to, a few centres of excellence in universities and research institutions in the United States and abroad in which the methods and points of view of molecular biology are teamed with the more traditional approaches of histology, embryology, and endocrinology in research pertinent to development of fertility control methods;”

2) “Supporting research of individual investigators, oriented toward development of contraceptive methods or of basic information on human reproduction relevant to such developments;”

3) “Encouraging, by making research funds available, as well as by other means, established and beginning investigators to turn their attention to aspects of research in reproductive biology that have implications for human fertility and its control;”

4) “Encouraging more biology and biochemistry students to elect careers in reproductive biology and human fertility control, through support of research and teaching programs in departments of zoology, biology, and biochemistry.”

In the Rockefeller Foundation’s 1988 annual report they state that their “population division” was making progress: 

India’s National Institute of Immunology (in New Delhi) successfully completed in 1988 the first phase of trials with three versions of an anti-fertility vaccine for women. Sponsored by the government of India and supported by the Foundation…” The National Institute of Health (NIH) published the abstract on ‘Anti-fertility Vaccines’ in 1989. “Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females.

In 1991, the WHO “Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation,” consisting of the World Health Organization, World Bank and UN Population Fund, reported:

Basic and clinical research on the development of birth control vaccines directed against the gametes or the preimplantation embryo. These studies have involved the use of advanced procedures in peptide chemistry, hybridoma technology and molecular genetics as well as the evaluation of a number of novel approaches in general vaccinology. As a result of this international, collaborative effort, a prototype anti-HCG vaccine is now undergoing clinical testing, raising the prospect that a totally new family planning method may be available before the end of the current decade.

The Biotechnology and Development Monitor reported:

The Task Force acts as a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D in the various working groups and supports research on different approaches, such as anti-sperm and anti-ovum vaccines and vaccines designed to neutralize the biological functions of hCG. The Task Force has succeeded in developing a prototype of an anti-hCG-vaccine.

Their “strategy” states: “Some prototype vaccines have undergone or are currently undergoing clinical trials in several countries. The entirely new immunological approach is based on the idea that a long-term contraceptive method, intended for use in family planning programmes in countries with low levels of medical care, should require little motivation of the user, should be cheap, and should be simple to apply by the provider. The approach is an integral part of the strategy of demographic control…”

Under the report’s section titled ‘Actors Involved,’ it goes on to list the governments of Sweden, United Kingdom, Norway, Denmark, Germany and Canada, as well as the UNFPA and the World Bank. It also includes The Population Council of the United States being funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, USAID, the National Institute of Immunology in India which is also funded by the Rockefeller Foundation and the Canadian International Development Research Centre, the US Contraceptive Development Program, and the US Center for Population Research at the National Institute of Child Health and Development.

In addition to the funders and supporters of this Task Force, they had setup clinical research and clinical trials with anti-fertility vaccines based at universities in Kenya, Germany, and France. 

Between 1973–1993 they had spent between $10 and $11 million on anti-fertility vaccines.

In the 1986 Rockefeller Foundation annual report, the organization admits funding research into the use of fertility-reducing compounds in relation to food for “widespread use”:

Male contraceptive studies are focused on gossypol, a natural substance extracted from the cotton plant, and identified by Chinese researchers as having an anti-fertility effect on men. Before widespread use can be recommended, further investigation is needed to see if lowering the dosage can eliminate undesirable side-effects without reducing its effectiveness as a contraceptive. The Foundation supported research on gossypol’s safety, reversibility and efficacy in seven different 1986 grants.

In the RF’s 1988 annual report, gossypol as a contraceptive was also elaborated upon (page 22):

Gossypol, a natural substance found in the cotton plant, continues to show promise as an oral contraceptive for men. Because it suppresses sperm production without affecting sex hormone levels, it is unique among the experimental approaches to fertility control in men. Foundation-funded scientists worldwide have assembled an array of information about how gossypol works, and studies continue on a wide variety of its clinical applications. Dose reduction is being investigated to reduce health risks associated with the use of gossypol.

Though they allege that the development of gossypol as an anti-fertility compound was halted in the 1990s, the cottonseed containing the substance was selected for mass distribution in early 2000s, under the guise of claiming that cottonseed could help defeat hunger and poverty. Genetic engineering ensued to allegedly reduce gossypol in cottonseed. But did they? Based on research, and given the current infertility rate in women and significantly reduced sperm rate in men, it wouldn’t seem to be the case.

Read the full, extensive report this journalist documented, with additional source links. The story continues.
Hillary Rodham Clinton and Laurance Rockefeller

The Rockefeller Foundation, World Health Organization, the World BankGAVI, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Clinton Foundation, USAID, Planned Parenthood, Eugenicists, big pharma, countless NGOs and foundations, multiple scientific research laboratories, big pharma, “philanthropists,” governments, Ivy league colleges and universities, and numerous individuals who have been in leadership at these organizations, creating off-shoots and additional NGOs, consist of people who do not have your best interest at heart, lie and deceive, deny and manipulate, and have brought endless levels of illness and infertility to countries across the world. If you cannot see this, you have lost your way. There are no “safety measures” or “follow-ups” in the research they do, for they do not care of the side effects and detriment it may cause, because it only aligns to further their goal. Just as the judge who presided over the most recent lawsuit against Monsanto stated, this is the case with many in positions of power:

Monsanto does not particularly care whether its product is in fact giving people cancer, focusing instead on manipulating public opinion and undermining anyone who raises genuine and legitimate concerns.

Click Here to go to Part 3 of 6 – DNA Collection and Biotechnology Companies

Download this full 6-part report in PDF format from the Bookshop. >

Bill GateseugenicsinfertilityPlanned Parenthoodpopulation growthRockefellerUSAIDvaccinesWHOBy Corey Lynn


Corey Lynn is an investigative journalist. Support her work by becoming a Patron or making a donation. Follow her at coreysdigs.com, on Gab, GabTV, and YouTube.

Eugenics, Infertility & Population Growth CRISIS- Part 1

Eugenics, Infertility & Population Growth CRISIS- Part 1

July 2, 2019 / 15 Comments

world population growth decline
eugenics health exhibit in kansas city MO
eugenics building
eugenics record office in long island, ny
Margaret Sanger Planned Parenthood
sterilization record
rockefeller and zika virus strain
bill & melinda gates foundation funding to other countries

Over 60,000 Americans were sterilized in the U.S., in the name of eugenics, but it didn’t end there. The phenomenon of men’s sperm declining by 50% and infertility in females rapidly rising – stumps no one – they just won’t tell you the truth.

• Over 60,000 Americans were sterilized in the name of eugenics and the Supreme Court law wasn’t repealed until the 1970s.

• The U.S. population growth hit a historic 80-year low in 2018 due to less births, while immigration continues to grow – projected to be the primary contributor after 2030.

• Nearly every western country has a historic low birth rate – media is silent.

• The Rockefellers worked with scientists, WHO, UNFPA, USAID, multiple governments, and others, to create anti-fertility vaccines that would sterilize both men and women on a mass scale, with research evolving into crops as well.

• DNA databases you voluntarily submit your DNA to are being used for scientific research, by law enforcement, and based on history – for eugenics.

• Over 60% of processed food Americans consume is genetically modified. Coincidentally, children have seen a 50% increase in food allergies since 2011, and obesity and health issues are rapidly rising. 

The U.S. has hit a historic 80-year low population growth, with the lowest birthrate since just after the Great Depression. This same pattern is happening in most of the western world. While these numbers continue to plummet, immigrants are being flown in, driven in, and boated in so as to meet their 2030 projected agenda for immigrants to create new growth in populations. As the infertility crisis in both men and women rapidly rises, the elders will outnumber the children. We have already reached the tipping point, and are on the brink of their end game. 

Eugenicists under the guise of “scientists” and “philanthropists” have been running this game for decades. Statistics don’t lie. The timeline paints the picture, the data creates the framework, and the circle of people instrumental in these agendas are quoted in their own words. It’s not a secret – they haven’t hidden this – one only needs to open their eyes. After all, they’ve long since formed their “population control” organizations, and have been telling you their concerns for years now. You just couldn’t imagine that what they meant by “control” was literally altering human physiology and outcomes to serve their eugenics agenda. 

World Population Growth Rate:

What is the true history of eugenics, its role across the globe, and where are our futures headed? The dictionary definition of eugenics, is the science of improving a human population by controlled breeding to increase the occurrence of desirable heritable characteristics. Another popular definition is, eugenics is a set of beliefs and practices that aim to improve the genetic quality of a human population by excluding certain genetic groups judged to be inferior, and promoting other genetic groups judged to be superior. Eugenics dates back to the 1800s, and make no mistake – though the terminology may have changed, it’s more than prevalent today. From pushed agendas, forced agendas, sterilizations, vaccines, GMOs, abortions, environmental, and otherwise – it’s happening. The evidence is well documented below.

Biotechnology, genomics, and genetics research laboratories have long held their positions in the scientific industry, while being funded by all the usual suspects.

Jackson Laboratory in Maine for example, home to many renown scientists, has been around since 1929, boasts the addition of the Rockefeller wing added in 1938, and is host to 63 research labs between Maine and Connecticut locations, that study the unique genetic makeup of each individual.

The ability to sequence and analyze entire mammalian genomes has created a revolution in biomedical research. Discovery has gone far beyond the single-gene sequence and protein function research previously possible. We are now investigating entire gene networks, background effects, the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms and structural variants across the genome, modeling genotype-phenotype relationships and much more.

Certainly, the CRISPR-Cas9 method for genome editing, helps things along. 

The History of Eugenics Timeline

1796 The Smallpox vaccine was introduced by Edward Jenner. He became known as the father of immunology, and continued his work into the mid 1800s.

Late 1800s Francis Galton coined the term eugenics. Galton was half-cousin of Charles Darwin. Galton was involved in the fields of genetics, psychology, meteorology, and statistics, and advocated for a selective breeding program for humans.

1885 French biologist, microbiologist, and chemist, Louis Pasteur created the first vaccines for anthrax and rabies.

Early 1900s Charles Davenport and Harry Laughlin began a eugenics movement in the U.S.

1901 John D. Rockefeller founded the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research (RIMR) in Arkansas, where William Welch served as chairman of the advisory board. Welch later became a trustee and chairman of the executive committee to the Carnegie Institution. Welch was a physician, pathologist, bacteriologist, and medical school administrator, in addition to being one of the four founding professors at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. By the 1930s, the Rockefeller Institute became the center for viral research where most in the field of virology trained. 

1907 Indiana was the first state to enact a sterilization law, and by 1935, 32 other states followed suit, which resulted in forced sterilization of 60,000 people in the U.S. by the mid 60s. Not only did they focus these sterilization programs on the disabled, but on the poor, criminals, and “low IQ” as well. California accounted for one third of the sterilizations across the country.
Eugenics Building, Fitter Families Contest, Kansas Free Fair. American eugenicists used state fairs as a venue for popular education, and judged “human stock” to select the most eugenically fit family in contests such as this one. Credit: American Philosophical Society. Noncommercial, educational use only.

1910 Charles Davenport founded the Eugenics Record Office (ERO) at Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory on Long Island “to improve the natural, physical, mental, and temperamental qualities of the human family.” Harry Laughlin was the first director, and they began collecting data on family pedigrees depicting the inheritance of mental, moral, and physical traits, with a focus on undesirable traits. The ERO operated for three decades.

The English focused on selective breeding for positive traits, while the U.S. focused on eliminating negative traits by preventing poor, uneducated, and minority populations from propagating.

1913 The Rockefeller Foundation was founded by John D. Rockefeller, John D. Rockefeller Jr., and Frederick Taylor Gates in New York. They have put millions into molecular biology and the health industry throughout the years. In 1984 the Rockefeller Foundation met with international delegates from the fields of medicine, government and philanthropy to discuss creating a global immunization program for children. With millions in financial support, they managed to increase immunization rates to 80%.

1914 Harry Laughlin published a Model Eugenical Sterilization Law that would authorize sterilization of the “socially inadequate.” It was to include people supported in institutions or maintained wholly or in part by public expense, in addition to feebleminded, insane, criminalistics, epileptic, inebriate, diseased, blind, deaf, deformed, dependent, orphans, ne’er-do-wells, tramps, the homeless and paupers. By the time it was published 12 states had already enacted sterilization laws.

1916 Margaret Sanger opened the first birth control clinic in Brooklyn New York. Sanger argued for compulsory sterilization and segregation for people with disabilities, right alongside eugenicists.

1917 Margaret Sanger founded the journal the ‘Birth Control Review.’ Some of her articles included:”Birth Control and Racial Betterment” (Feb. 1919), “Some Moral Aspects of Eugenics” (June 1920), “The Eugenic Conscience” (February 1921), “The Purpose of Eugenics” (December 1924), “Birth Control and Positive Eugenics” (July 1925) and “Birth Control: The True Eugenics” (August 1928). 

A couple of quotes from Margaret Sanger’s article on Birth Control and Racial Betterment:

While I personally believe in the sterilization of the feeble-minded, the insane and syphilitic, I have not been able to discover that these measures are more than superficial deterrents when applied to the constantly growing stream of the unfit. They are excellent means of meeting a certain phase of the situation, but I believe in regard to these, as in regard to other eugenic means, that they do not go to the bottom of the matter.

Eugenics without Birth Control seems to us a house builded upon the sands. It is at the mercy of the rising stream of the unfit. It cannot stand against the furious winds of economic pressure which have buffeted into partial or total helplessness a tremendous proportion of the human race. Only upon a free, self-determining motherhood can rest any unshakable structure of racial betterment.

1921 Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League.

1922 The American Eugenics Society was founded by Irving Fisher, Madison Grant, Harry H. Laughlin, Henry Fairfield Osborn, and Henry Crampton. It later became the Society for the Study of Social Biology in 1973 after Roe V. Wade was released, and eventually the Society for Biodemography and Social Biology. It was formed after the second international conference on Eugenics in New York in 1921, with its focus on population control, genetics, eugenic health, and medical genetics. Osborn was quoted stating, “Birth control and abortionare turning out to be great eugenic advances of our time.”

1926 Margaret Sanger stated in her autobiography that she had addressed the women’s branch of the Ku Klux Klan, who were a group against blacks, Catholics, and Jews. Planned Parenthood has recently denouncedSanger’s address to the Ku Klux Klan, after it was put in the spotlight.

1927 The Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenicswas founded in Berlin, Germany. During the Nazi era, it was strongly associated with theories of Nazi eugenics and racial hygiene. Between 1937-1938 they analyzed 600 childrendescending from French-African soldiers in Nazi Germany, and later sterilized them.

1927 Supreme court Buck V. Bell, the state of Virginia sought to sterilize Carrie Buck for giving birth to a baby out of wedlock. Supreme Court Justice Wendell Holmes ruled against Buck, declaring “It is better for all the world, if instead of waiting to execute degenerate offspring for crime, or to let them starve for imbecility, society can prevent those who are manifestly unfit from continuing their kind…Three generations of imbeciles is enough.” And so it was – legitimized by the Supreme Court. It wasn’t until the 1970s that state legislatures began repealing these laws.

Margaret Sanger endorsed this decision. Adolph Hitler himself was impressed, and the Nazi’s sought advice from California in perfecting their own efforts, because California’s program was so bolden. Source: Huffington Post

1929 Planned Parenthood’s inception of its first “Maternal Health Center” located on Oak Street in San Francisco.

1930 The Rockefeller Foundation began financing the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute of Anthropology, Human Heredity, and Eugenics, and continued to fund them up through 1939, being fully aware of their eugenics experiments.

1933 Borrowing from Harry Laughlin’s Model Law, the German Nazi government adopted a law that provided legal basis for sterilizing more than 350,000 people. Laughlin published a translation of the German Law for the Prevention of Defective Progeny in The Eugenical News, and was awarded an honorary degree from the University of Heidelberg in 1936, in tribute for his work in “the science of racial cleansing.”

1939 Controversial statement by Margaret Sanger: She reiterated the need for black ministers to head up the “negro project” in a letter to Clarence Gamble in Dec. 1939, stating “We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.” 

Planned Parenthood created a fact sheet debunking it was a racist statement, but when reviewing some of Sanger’s articles, it paints a different story. Planned Parenthood also states that the comments circulating about Sanger calling black people, poor peoples, Slavs, Latins, and Hebrews “human weeds,” originated from an anonymous flyer.

Despite Planned Parenthood’s denial of being racist or having a population agenda – otherwise known as eugenics in this case – poor and minority areas have always been a target of theirs, as well as eugenicists. Live Action recently contacted Planned Parenthood to ask “if they would accept donations to specifically abort black babies.” The response was alarming. 

1940s The U.S. eugenics programs were discredited after what took place by the Nazis in Germany, but it never really stopped.

1942 Margaret Sanger’s American Birth Control League changed its name to Planned Parenthood. It would seem this name was more “suitable” given the circumstances.

1947 The Rockefeller Foundation obtained a sample of the Zika virus strain. Zika was first discovered by their foundation-supported Virus Research Institute in Entebbe, Uganda. A sample of the virus strain was then given to ATCC, a non-profit organization that authenticates and preserves microorganisms for research, by J. Casals of The Rockefeller Foundation in 1953. In 2015 and 2016, outbreaks of Zika virus suddenly showed up in Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, Florida and Texas. The Zika virus is transmitted by mosquitoes, causing fever and rash, and can cause microcephaly in babies born to mothers infected during pregnancy. They consider it a big “threat to pregnant women.” The US immediately passes a “Zika Response and Preparedness Appropriations Act of 2016,” with a whopping $350 million disbursing out of the CDC. Then, governments and Bill Gates rallied together $18 million for researchers to releasemosquitoes they infected with Wolbachia bacteria to allegedly combat the Zika affected areas in Colombia and Brazil – something Gates had been working on since 2011.

1967 John D. Rockefeller III was honored with the Planned Parenthood Federation of America Margaret Sanger Award.

1968 Report by the Rockefeller Foundation on ‘Problems of Population’ and their development of anti-fertility vaccines. (more on this below)

1972 Planned Parenthood’s President, Alan Guttmacher, was honored with the Planned Parenthood Federation of America Margaret Sanger Award. He was also Vice President of the American Eugenics Society. Other honorees have included Hillary Clinton, Nancy Pelosi, and Ted Turner, to name a few.

1973 Abortion was made legal by the Supreme Court following Roe v. Wade. Coincidentally, this is also the timeframe in which most states repealed their sterilization laws. 1973 marked the final sterilization performed in North Carolina, which was one of the most aggressive states, going so far as to sterilize those with IQs 70 or under. They gave social workers the power to designate people for sterilization. Almost like giving child protective services (CPS) the power to remove children from homes today. The patterns of power don’t change, they just shift.

1982 U.S. officials loosen restrictions on DNA cloning in mammals and the transgenics era begins.

1986 The National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program was established to ensure the manufacturers were not held liable. Since 1988, the U.S. government has paid out$4.1 billion in injury and death claims.

1988 The Human Genome Project was first articulated by the U.S. National Academy of Sciences, and later adopted through a detailed series of five-year plans written jointly by the National Institutes of Health and the Department of Energy. Congress funded the project at roughly $2.7 billion. The human genome sequencing was completed and made public in 2003. Multiple universities and research centers were involved throughout the United States, the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Japan and China. The genome sequencing allows scientists to have a complete map needed to make the human body. 

1988 The Rockefeller Foundation’s annual report states that their “population division” was making progress: “India’s National Institute of Immunology (in New Delhi) successfully completed the first phase of trials with three versions of an anti-fertility vaccine for women. Sponsored by the government of India and supported by the Foundation…” The National Institute of Health (NIH) published the abstract on ‘Anti-fertility Vaccines’ in 1989. “Vaccines are under development for the control of fertility in males and females.” (more on this below.)

1993 The Rockefeller Foundation became a major sponsor of the Children’s Vaccine Initiative and on December 14, 1993 they allocated $2.5 million to support further research programs and the development and distribution of developing country children’s vaccines.

1994 (a big year in history on many more fronts, far more than what is listed below.)

• Commercial sale of genetically modified food began. By 2016 185 million hectares, accounting for 12% of the global cropland was being utilized for GMO growth. Currently, 75-80% of food Americans consume is genetically modified.

• Dr. John Sundberg from Jackson Laboratory in Maine collaborated with Nobel Laureate Harald zur Housen in sequencing the dog oral papilloma virus. The virus and experiments they designed provided the proof of concept for the recombinant human cervical cancer vaccine. (HPV)

• Bill and Hillary Clinton spearheaded the free and mandatory vaccines for children program in the U.S.

• The William H. Gates Foundation was formed, later becoming the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation in 2000, with their goal centered on global immunization.

This only reflects from 1994 through 2011. Gates Foundation Funding:

1997 The William J. Clinton Foundation was founded, later becoming the Clinton Foundation, with a big focus on maternal healthcare, reproductive rights and abortion, immunization, and climate change.

1998 The FDA approved emergency contraception, otherwise known as the morning after pill.

2000 The Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization (GAVI) was formed by Bill Gates, to accelerate the use of underused and new vaccines, increase funding, and shape the vaccine markets.

2006 The FDA approved the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccine which plays a significant role in this report.

2006: The International Finance Facility for Immunization (IFFIM) was incorporated, as well as the GAVI Fund Affiliate (GFA). The GAVI Fund Affiliate: GFA was incorporated in May as a private company limited by guarantee under the United Kingdom Companies Act 1985, with company registration number 5830438. It is also registered as a charity with the Charity Commission for England and Wales, with charity registration number 1115297. GFA enters into pledge agreements with sovereign government donors and then assigns to IFFIM the right to receive cash payments under those agreements. Also, all cash payments from IFFIM to GAVI are channeled through GFA.

IFFIM was incorporated in June as a private company limited by guarantee under the United Kingdom Companies Act 1985, with company registration number 5857343. It is also registered as a charity with the Charity Commission for England and Wales, with charity registration number 1115413. IFFIm is a multilateral development institution that raises funds by issuing bonds in the international capital markets. It then disburses the funds to GFA which subsequently uses the funds to support various GAVI vaccine procurement, immunization and health systems strengthening (“HSS”) programs.

2009 The vaccine Gardasilmanufactured by Merck for the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) was administered to around 16,000 girls between the ages of nine and fifteen in the Khammam district in Telangana, India. Months later, many girls feel ill and by 2010 five had died. In Gujarat, another 14,000 were vaccinated with the HPV Cervarix vaccine manufactured by GSK, and two more deaths were reported. Numerous girls were hospitalized, and there were reports by 120 girls that experienced seizures, stomach aches, or onset of menstruation after receiving the vaccine. A committee determined that a huge number of consent forms were not furnished, in many cases consent for conducting these studies, was taken from the hostel wardens, and the children had no idea about the disease or the vaccine. Yet, all seven deaths were dismissed as suicides, viral infections, malaria, accidental drowning in a well, and subarachnoid hemorrhage (without an autopsy), etc. Overall, this was a study that was taking place in 5 countries, whereby they were documenting the effects of the new vaccines. 

The study was sponsored by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. There is a lengthy, full reporton this, the studies in India and beyond, and the Gates foundation’s ties to the UPA government and big pharma. Separate from that, it should be noted that the Gates Foundation partners with well over 30 governments, the WHO, multiple other organizations and foundations, along with big pharma, via GAVI and the Global Fund so as to control the entire immunization market worldwide.

2010 Bill & Melinda Gates pledge $10 billion over the next 10 years to vaccinate the world’s poorest countries.

2012 The Bill & Melinda Gates foundation set out to raise billions of dollars to provide contraceptives to 120 million women worldwide. Yet their focus was on poorer locations such as sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia. Melinda’s take on this:

If you see what’s happened in other countries that have had contraceptives, they use them first of all and the birth rates go down. The question is could it have come down even more quickly?

2013 The HHS awarded $5,877,710 to 49 victims in claims made against the Gardasil HPV vaccine made by Merck. Over 200 claims were filed. There were 26 deaths reported between September 1, 2010 and September 15, 2011, as well as seizures, paralysis, blindness, pancreatitis, speech problems, short term memory loss and Guillain-Barre. The deaths occurred within one year of the Gardasil vaccination, all of whom were previously healthy. Despite this, much like the case in India just one year prior, the CDC and other government and health agencies continues to purport that the HPV vaccine is safe, encourages parents to get their children vaccinated and even goes so far to say, “there was no unusual pattern or clustering to the deaths that would suggest that they were caused by the vaccine.” 

According to the Washington Post, the Gardasil product information insert states: “Gardasil…. Not been evaluated for carcinogenicity or impairment of fertility.”

Merck only studied the Gardasil vaccine in less than 1,200 girls under the age of 16 prior to it being released to the market. (More on the HPV vaccine and fertility below.)

2014 The FDA approved the morning after pill to be available over the counter to girls/women of all ages, without the need for a prescription.

2014 Anti-fertility vaccines were given to millions of girls in Kenya under the guise of an anti-tetanus vaccination program. UNICEF and WHO distributed the vaccines for free with the help of GAVI. Independent laboratories tested six samples and all came back positive for the HCG antigen which is used in anti-fertility vaccines. Despite the fact there were no cases of tetanus, they proceeded to vaccinate females between the age of 14-49 years old, and did not vaccinate any males. The WHO and UNICEF fully denied all allegations.

2015 Scripps Research developed an artificial antibody to inactivate the HIV virus. “By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.” They are testing it on Ebola, Malaria, Influenza and Hepatitis as well. The first human trial, called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer (I.G.T.) is underway and several new ones are planned. Chief scientific officer at Sanofi stated, “It could revolutionize the way we immunize against public health threats in the future.” The synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.

Coincidentally, 35 ambassadors from other countries just visited Scripps Research Institute on June 17, 2019 while on a State Department Tour. According to their press release, “the visit was intended to build relationships between the ambassadors and San Diego’s biotech companies, nonprofit and academic institutes, and leaders, and in the process open doors for local organizations eager to develop global partnerships and investment possibilities.”

In a 2015 Scripps press release, they announced the nearly $6 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation that they were awarded for this revolutionary vaccine development. Over the past five years, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has given $174 million in grants to Scripps.

In 2017 Scripps Department of Immunology and Microbiology on the Florida campus of the Scripps Research Institute received $4.8 millionfrom the National Institutes of Health to support a five-year project to bring gene therapy immunizations, beginning with an HIV vaccine, closer to human clinical trials

2019 Full term abortion became legal in New York, followed by several other states. The abortion agenda is a very dark topic with a lot of intersections.

2019 In an open letter to legislatures, Dr. Theresa Deisher, a pioneer in molecular and cellular physiology, broke down the scientific data on fetal DNA contaminants in the MMR vaccine for measles, mumps and rubella. There have been 483 injury and death claims filed against the MMR vaccine through the vaccine injury compensation program.

Click here to continue to Part 2 of 6 – The Rockefeller Foundation’s Anti-fertility Plan

This 6-part comprehensive report will illustrate the many ways in which eugenics is still in full force today, what and who are behind it, and show statistics as to where we are at today as a result of it.

Download this full 6-part report in PDF format from the Bookshop. >

Bill GateseugenicsGMOsinfertilitypopulation growthRockefellervaccinesWHOBy Corey Lynn


Corey Lynn is an investigative journalist. Support her work by becoming a Patron or making a donation. Follow her at coreysdigs.com, on Gab, GabTV, and YouTube

Bad Things Coming for Those Responsible? – Pfizer and Moderna CFOs Run for the Exits

Merissa Hansen: The CFOs of Pizer and Moderna have both resigned over the past 72 hours.

Luke Rudkowski: “There were literal media organizations telling the [British] government to stop releasing the data in the United Kingdom, which showed that the vaccine actually [does more harm than good] in certain age groups… There’s a lot of ruling elites that want to keep your mind away from their KILLING of you, and they distract you with a lot of utter nonsense.”

Full Video: https://wearechange.org/mike-tyson-is-warning-about-rich-people-hunting-poor-people/

Follow the Fox
Telegram: https://t.me/VigilantFox
Gettr: https://gettr.com/user/VigilantFox
Truth: https://truthsocial.com/@VigilantFox
Gab: https://gab.com/VigilantFox
Minds: https://minds.com/VigilantFox

CDC and FDA ‘altered’ Covid guidance and even ‘suppressed’ findings while under political pressure, bombshell report suggests: Whistle-blower employees say they feared ‘retaliation’ if they spoke up


  • Federal investigators interviewed top-level directors and managers at agencies
  • They also opened a hotline for employees to report ‘political interference’
  • Government Accountability Office uncovered widespread allegations of this
  • They raised fears that Covid guidance may have been ‘altered or suppressed’
  • GAO warned none of the agencies had systems in place for reporting allegations
  • Said they had failed to train staff in how to report and spot political interference
  • Follows allegations White House waged a war on science early in the pandemic 

CDC and FDA officials ‘altered’ Covid guidance and even ‘suppressed’ findings related to the virus due to political pressure, a bombshell report suggests.

Investigators from the watchdog Government Accountability Office (GAO) spoke to more than a dozen directors and managers who worked at the agencies behind the country’s pandemic guidance. 

They unearthed allegations of ‘political interference’ in scientific reports, raising fears that research was tampered with.

In its 37-page report, the GAO warned that neither agency had a system in place for reporting allegations of political interference. It also said they had failed to train staff how to spot and report this.

Whistleblowers said they did not speak up at the time for fear of retaliation, because they were unsure how to report the issues or believed leaders were already aware.  

This is just the latest in a growing patchwork of reports suggesting politicians influenced ‘scientific’ papers during the pandemic for their own ends.

On Tuesday, the Biden administration’s top medical adviser Dr Anthony Fauci declared the U.S. is now ‘out of the pandemic phase’ of Covid, citing low cases and hospitalizations.

But health experts were quick to question the claim — buried at the end of an interview with PBS’ NewsHour — suggesting he may have bungled his words and should only have said the nation was in a phase of ‘low hospitalizations’. 

In the early phase the White House was accused of waging a war on science, with then-president Donald Trump repeatedly pushing for Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reports to be amended to support his views, as shown in emails made public by congressional investigators last April.

The CDC is facing allegations that it altered and suppressed Covid guidance that was meant to save lives. (Stock image of its headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia)

View gallery
The CDC is facing allegations that it altered and suppressed Covid guidance that was meant to save lives. (Stock image of its headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia) 
The FDA is facing the same accusations, following its approval of a blood plasma treatment early in the pandemic. Hospitals are no longer offering blood plasma to most patients because it provided 'little benefit'. (Stock image of their headquarters in White Oak, Maryland)

View gallery
The FDA is facing the same accusations, following its approval of a blood plasma treatment early in the pandemic. Hospitals are no longer offering blood plasma to most patients because it provided ‘little benefit’. (Stock image of their headquarters in White Oak, Maryland) 
The Biden administration's top medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci has declared the United States is now 'out of the pandemic phase' of Covid-19 , as cases and hospitalizations associated with the disease remain low

View gallery
The Biden administration’s top medical advisor Dr. Anthony Fauci has declared the United States is now ‘out of the pandemic phase’ of Covid-19 , as cases and hospitalizations associated with the disease remain low 

‘A few respondents from CDC and [Food and Drug Administration] FDA stated they felt that the potential political interference they observed resulted in the alteration or suppression of scientific findings,’ GAO investigators wrote in the report.

‘Some of these respondents believed that this potential political interference may have resulted in the politically motivated alteration of public health guidance or delayed publication of Covid-related scientific findings.’

The GAO report published last week looked into the two agencies, alongside the National Institutes of Health (NIH) — America’s top research institution— and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response (ASPR) — in charge of natural disaster response.

Taschi Talks – Episode 15: Trust the Experts? ATAGI and the 4th booster.

Taschi reads through the ATAGI statement on recommendations on a winter booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine, with a critical eye. ‘Trust the science’ and ‘peer review’ is what we have repeatedly heard – but do the ‘experts’ follow their own advice? Have a listen!