kensingtonblues.com/

Amber Nichols

Edited Audio Interview: Part 1

Don’t blame yourself… cause that’s what we do… addicts in general blame ourselves for everything and that’s what kills you… is holding on to that guilt and shame. It will make you go back out and use drugs. If you put that blame on yourself. Because I know I’m a different person whenever I’m using. I’m not, I don’t care about anyone and that’s just with everyone that I’ve met. So don’t blame yourself for things that have happened like in your addiction. Because that makes you who you are and that’s why I’m telling my story because it might help somebody else.

I’m Amber Lynn Nichols, I’m twenty-four, I’ll be twenty-five in like two weeks. I grew up in a very abusive household, like physically, mentally, emotionally and I was a very confused kid because not only was I getting abused physically and mentally, like my step dad and my half-brother were molesting me at the same time. 

So I was like eight years old and all these people like said they hated me and they didn’t want me part of their family, they called me it because I wasn’t a human being, I wasn’t allowed to eat with them, like just really like twisted stuff.

My dad was like in and out of my life and he was an addict and I always remember like packing my bags and waiting outside for him to show up and he would never show up. Like he was just never there. But then when I was eleven, my dad introduced me to like drugs and alcohol and I started drinking and I started doing Percocet and Xanax and Adderall and before I knew it, I was like doing it every day. 

That just like kinda helped me cope with the fact of what was going on and it helped me escape. Because all my life like I felt like I wasn’t good enough, like nobody loved me, I wasn’t good enough. And like that stayed with me my whole addiction. 

And whenever I‘d drink and do drugs like… I felt good enough, you know? I never, I never felt good enough but whenever I’d drink and do drugs I did. Like nothing mattered. As soon as I took a drink or as soon as I did drugs nothing mattered. 

I grew up in Cuba, Missouri. It’s a small town like a thousand people. There wasn’t much to do there so I hung out with kids that got high. 

And my mom was so different back then. Like she was very codependent and she would do anything just to make a guy happy, so whenever he was abusive like she wouldn’t argue with him because she just wanted to be loved and we were like poor and we met my step dad and he was rich and so he was like ‘Oh I’m gonna save you,’ kinda thing like… and then he just turned into an abusive asshole. 

My dad was, he was just, always my best friend, like he was not a dad. Like I can never honestly say he was a father because he wasn’t, like he was my using buddy. 

Whenever I would go over to his house it was like socially acceptable for me to be drinking… so I loved going there and um, I just remember getting really drunk and he would take away all my liquor because I would just be outrageous. Like one time I broke somebody’s nose while I was drunk and my dad took away my vodka and then he gave it back to me because he was like ‘You don’t know how to control your liquor,’ like but I was really young so like of course I didn’t. 

By the time I was sixteen, let me just fast forward a little bit… My mom had left my stepdad because she had suspicion like he was molesting me and she just was unhappy finally so she left him and by the time I was sixteen, I was always hanging out with older people because they were always getting drugs and drinking and so I started shooting up meth when I was sixteen and but my whole life, like pills, like opiates were a constant, like no matter what, I was still doing opiates, like I mixed in every drug there was but opiates were always there.

My mom had no idea, like that I was on drugs like she had no idea um, like the cops would bring me home and stuff when I was fourteen, they would like knock on the door and I’m like wasted, they’re like ‘We found your daughter in the back seat of two twenty-three year old males car and she was passed out,’ ha yeah like, I was uncontrollable. 

Like my mom would ground me, I would sneak out, get arrested all the time, but um my mom would um… after she left my stepdad, me and her did not talk and she blamed me for us having to move out and her leaving him, um, we never talked about what she thought he was doing or anything but she ended up getting with another guy named Chris, and Chris hated me. He would like call me a worthless monster and just say I was no good, she should just ship me off and get rid of me. 

And so my mom tried. She tried to put me in this place called Boys and Girls Town, its for like juvenile kids, like kids that have charges and stuff but I never had charges stick on me so when she tried to ship me off it didn’t work and he left her and he said it’s my fault because I was, you know, no good, blah, blah, blah, he couldn’t get rid of me…. and so my mom when he left her she’s like ‘I hate you, I wish I never had you,’ and I remember writing her a note saying that I was so sorry that he left her. And I just wanted to be her friend and she ripped it all out, like ripped it into pieces, threw it in my face and left. 

I hated her, I hated my mom for a long time. Like, it just… I couldn’t, I couldn’t stand her and then on my sixteenth birthday we were going to the city because she was like ‘I’m gonna buy you a present,’ so I- I bought my car myself, and we got there and I said my foot hurt from driving cause it was like an hour and a half and I had just got my car. And she was like, ‘You’re an ungrateful little bitch, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah,’ and she was just going off and we climbed back in the car and she was like, ‘fuck it, just get in the car.’ So she’s driving my car but she’s screaming at me and so I’m yelling at her back and she just reaches over and she backhands me. She had a ring on and it chipped my tooth. And I called my dad through like, I stuck the phone in my sleeve and I called my dad and my dad heard everything and my mom thought like I was talking to myself, like cause I was trying to explain where we were and um, I explained where we were and the cops came. 

And she ended up getting DFS involved which is like [The Department of ] Family Services, um, they were at our house for like six months. 

They came in and she was like oh, well like this is how she is, she doesn’t listen, she doesn’t show up for curfew, like she won’t listen to one thing I say and DFS told her, ‘Let her do what she wants, she’s just a teenager, she’s going through a phase.’ 

When I lost my virginity when I was fourteen, she pulled me out of school and homeschooled me but she had two jobs and she was in college, so she was never there, so I didn’t do any homework, and I would leave and go get high all day and then come back you know.

I always got shipped off places. So when I was nineteen I started getting shipped off to rehabs, um, because I’d be like, ‘Ah, I can’t do this, I want help,’ and they would ship me off to Florida, Mississippi, Chicago, Jersey, Philly and when I got shipped here I went to detox in Jersey and I AMA’d which is like leaving against medical advice, with some guy and I hitchhiked all the way from Tom’s River to Camden and they were like, ‘Oh no, I know a place you’ll love, Kensington, its zombie land, you’ll love it, everybody walks around nodding out, like they got the best dope, like you’ll love it.’ And that’s how I ended up in Kensington. 

In my addiction I was a prostitute and I was a stripper but I put the prostitution behind me so I decided to strip in South Philly and so I, I didn’t sleep for the whole two weeks like I was so scared because I didn’t know where I was and I looked around me and the shit I saw… So I would like sit at bus stops and I would like nod out but as soon as I would come to, I would get back up and keep walking again. And the guy that I left rehab with wanted more drugs off me one night when I got off work from stripping and I told him no and he pulled a knife out and chased me and he was trying to kill me or whatever, I don’t know what he was trying to do, he was trying to rob me but… um, I got away from him and then I was just alone, in Kensington… yeah, it was not a fun time. 

I was like on crack and heroin, so, like if I was feeling tired I would do crack but like, I’ve always loved heroin, I’ve never, if I, hands down you hand me like any drug, I will always choose heroin. Like, if I could use successfully without the consequences I would. 

I always had sugar daddy’s, everywhere I went, like even when I was homeless in Kensington, my sugar daddy’s from St. Louis were sending me money. Yeah, so like, how I explain it was, I was a snake, like, I would slither into your life and I would stick my fangs in you and I would suck all you had out, like your emotions, your money, everything I could take from you I would, and when you didn’t have anything left for me I would leave, like, that’s just how I was. It was bad, it was a horrible way [to live], like I’m doing my step 4 right now and I really got to look at myself and how bad I hurt people. 

I was engaged 3 times at the same time with all different people that thought I actually loved them and I didn’t, I loved heroin. I didn’t love anybody else, you know. I loved heroin more than I loved my son. I can say that because I know that it’s true. That’s all you think about, all you care about. And every time I would do heroin I would always mix Fentanyl and Xanax together and every time I would do it I would just wish I wouldn’t wake up. I would sit there and pray like, ‘Please do let me wake up.’ And I would overdose and they would Narcan me. And I didn’t overdose for a long time but then I started overdosing, like 3 years of straight heroin addiction and never overdosed, then I started overdosing. 

In October of last year, um, me and my boyfriend, my boyfriend was sober, I was sober, I got paralyzed by a chiropractor and I was in Jefferson for a month and a half and they were giving me opioids for the pain. And I got out and I last like a week. I went to Kensington got drugs, yeah, that’s where everybody goes. And I used and then I set it right down and I went to a meeting. I had a week clean and then my boyfriend who had a year and three months came over and he was high. And instead of like saying… well I did try to call someone but he didn’t want me to call anybody. But instead of saying like get out, like I can’t be around you, I did what I always did. Like in every one of my relationships it was a using relationship so I was like if I use with him nothing bad can happen. And so I used with him and we went to Kensington, got more drugs, came back to his spot and then the last thing he said to me was, “I love you,” and “we’re not doing this tomorrow.” And I nodded out, when I woke up, he was having trouble breathing, but you know like with heroin like, sometimes people like have trouble breathing but they come out of it, so I threw water on him, I smacked him and I snorted another bag instead of calling 911 and I nodded back out. And when I woke up he wasn’t  breathing. He was dead. And I have no idea for how long because I was out you know… and for three days after that I thought, I was in such denial that I thought he was alive but nobody was telling me. And I went to detox, but they had hit me with Narcan, when the ambulance got there, because by the time they got me to the hospital I had overdosed… so, but I didn’t like eat or sleep or drink anything for like 8 days, the whole time I was in detox because I just hated myself so much, cause anybody in their right mind who wasn’t on drugs would call 911. But my thing was, he’s not overdosing, let me snort a bag and figure out how to deal with this situation. Like that’s how you think on heroin. Like let me get high so I know how to deal with this situation. 

Amber Nichols, 4.10.2019
Edited Audio Interview: Part 2

Like, I get in my head about being on Suboxone because I was in NA and as soon as I got put on Suboxone my sponsor told me I wasn’t clean and I couldn’t claim to be. I, I thought about just giving up when she said that to me. Thank God I didn’t, but when she told me that I was like, ‘Why should I even do this thing?’ Like I couldn’t share and say, ‘Hey I have thirty days clean.’ She’s like, ‘You can’t do that.’ I was furious, I was in tears, I was like, ‘I’m not welcome?’ And I had been a member of NA for a year and I had all my friends there and everyone I asked said, ‘You’re not clean.’ All my sober friends told me, ‘You’re not clean.’ If I didn’t go to AA (instead of NA) I wouldn’t have stayed clean. I wouldn’t have… 

If you were to tell my mom like, ‘Your daughter shouldn’t be on MAT.’ She would be like, ‘Well she would be dead.’ 

I mean I don’t run around with a sign on my head sayin’ hey I’m on Suboxone but the people that are close to me know. And like my boyfriend knows. He’s an alcoholic, he’s in sobriety, he has like 8 months clean. He knows I’m on Suboxone and he said okay. Like, I’m in psychology in school and I’ve seen the statistics of the maintenance combine with recovery and its positive. Like I don’t even care if you’re high and you come into a meeting. Maybe, in-between like nods or whatever, you’ll hear something that makes you come back. You know, you need to accept people at where they’re at. Like I’m a big fan of harm reduction. Because some people aren’t ready so like what can we do, like, don’t use alone, you know, use clean needles, don’t share needles… I shared needles! I’m really lucking I didn’t get anything. I was a sex worker! I’m really lucky I didn’t get anything. You know but, people are so easy to push people away because they are not where they want them to be. 

In this stage of my recovery I try not to put myself closer to a drink or a drug. Have I helped people? Have I thrown out their drugs before in recovery? Yeah. I brought my friend Brandon when I had six months clean, I brought him to detox. I was just picking him up to bring him to a meeting and I talked him into going to detox, he’s been clean ever since. He has a year and a half now. 

If I just help one person by saying look, like this is what happened and this is how I got through it and this is who I am today, like that’s all I want, you know.

And by the way, my mom and me are best friends now. She’s my biggest cheerleader. She’s, she never thought that she’d be able to see me sober. She never thought it. It was hard, cause I blamed her for a lot. You have to surrender. You have to want more like, I always say your rock bottom is whenever you raise it up to meet you. Cause I hit my rock bottom a long time ago. But I, you got to stop digging. That’s what it’s all about. I had to surrender to the fact that I’m powerless over alcohol and drugs and I can never use again. Like just for today. That’s all I try to do, make it till midnight, go to sleep. Some days it’s easy, some days it’s hard. 

Like right now I almost have three months but the last time I used, I used for five days and I lost my house, I lost my job… in five days, I was broke, I went through all my savings and I got kicked out of my house, I lost my job, like it was horrible, for five days of using and I detoxed myself on my bed. And that’s hard to do, I’d never done that before in my life. I always like, anytime I would get sick, automatically, ‘Where can I get money? Where can I get drugs?’ Even if I’m broke, I’m either gonna rob somebody or I’m gonna have sex with somebody so I cannot be sick. 

That’s the scariest part of the heroin addiction is your body, not only does your mind scream for it, its like your body screams for it. It’s horrible, I wouldn’t wish dope-sickness on anyone, not even my own worst enemy, I would not wish it on them. 

I never thought I’d be able to say it but, from High School drop out… I’m a college student. I work 40 hours a week. I’ve had the same job for over a year. I’ve gotten three raises while I was at that job, like I don’t know… I wake up everyday and I’m not dope-sick which is like amazing and I don’t have the want to use drugs on most days which is a miracle because that’s what my whole, I don’t know, what, thirteen years of my life was about. And the crazy part about it is, is I have a life that I never thought I would. Even though life gets ‘lifey.’ Like, I never thought I’d be okay being a ‘normy.’ Like I actually look forward to doing nothing. Like, I like going home, snuggling in bed after a long day and watching a movie. Like, I’m boring or whatever, but like, I love it. I love like, I don’t have to like, run around trying to find drugs or figure out how I’m gonna get something to eat or figure out where I’m going to lay my head at night. Like my life is okay, like its stable and it’s only gonna get better. With recovery that’s what happens. 

I have a good foundation of sober people and have a great sponsor. I go to five meetings a week. And like I do everything to combat against my disease. I found a higher power which really helped me. Um… but I think I really had to get beat down for that part because I didn’t believe in God or a higher power on anything. But I got to the point where I had to believe in something. 

Ummm… my biggest fear is that I will relapse after I have time and die an addict still. That’s my biggest fear because addiction is so sneaky. And it comes to you and its like ‘Hey like, lets get high.’ And your brain just goes ‘Okay,’ one day. Every time I’ve relapsed, that morning I woke up, I didn’t plan on relapsing and it just happened. But that’s my biggest fear… that I’ll die and addict. A using addict. Cause I see people with thirty years, five years, they go back out and they die. That’s the thing about this disease, is you can be doing great and then the next day you’re not. 

Embedded in the Badlands Video Series

At the start of 2018, I began shooting a series of videos in collaboration with reporter Courtenay Harris Bond and editor Hunter Siede about the opioid crisis in Kensington. Over the course of a year, we produced 7 short videos. See below. Warning: some videos contain graphic content.

Trailer

Episode 1: Point in Time Count

Episode 2: Anna

Episode 3: Tulip Street

Episode 4: Angel

Episode 5: Kensington Avenue

Episode 6: Don

Episode 7: Medication Assisted Recovery Anonymous

Kensington Blues Exhibit at Drexel University

Press Release

My name is Hope Daniels. That’s not really my name.

Anonymous Portrait no. 1, 2018.

Part One. Audio Player

00:00

00:00

My name is Hope Daniels. That’s not really my name. I decided to go with that name because I got a new job and I feel like my job won’t want me or basically wouldn’t want to hire me if they knew that I was in recovery.

I used to use heroin. I used to snort it and inject it. And it basically took everything from me and it made me a monster. 

What job would want me if I were to be honest and tell them I’m in recovery, uh, from shooting heroin?

I grew up in Upper Darby and I started to use heroin mostly in Kensington. I was using for about five years. 

My mom noticed the whole alcohol problem, um, I would go to like bars and stuff when I was like 18, before I was even old enough to get in, 19. And um, it got really bad. I moved in with one of my EX’s and um he would buy me beer, get me into bars and it’s crazy cause I have a whole family full of alcoholics and I didn’t think I was one of them at all but like looking back the signs were all there. It started with like beer and then gin and then I would like only go to work to get a paycheck so I could have money to afford like the beer on the weekends or this or that and it got to the point of me drinking just orange juice and vodka just sitting home doing nothing. 

So then I got put into the rehab. I said, ‘Fine, I’ll go.’ And I fell like that just opened the doors to so much more heartache and misery. I try to stay compassionate but a lot of people in there like, were, they still… sometimes they go because they are court mandated to or ‘Do you ever really want to be here?’ or, it’s a hard process. So yeah, there would be certain days where like, ‘Oh, I used to shoot up this and that, I used to 8 ball this and that, be on the street, dododododo’… Like trying to sound cool and stuff but that’s all they’ve ever known. Like, how do you have a normal conversation? Well, that’s how addicts have a normal conversation. 

I got involved in a stupid rehab romance. All theses terms… if you’re in addiction you’ll know all of these terms… um but, I got into a rehab romance with this guy, we got out- or I got out and then I waited for him and when he got out we moved into his mom’s house and that’s where I actually tried heroin for the first time. That’s where I tried wet for the first time. That’s where I did some xanies, drinking, this, that, we stole to feed ourselves. It was a mess and by the time my mom came a rescued me, my mom is an angel, she’s, I feel like, throughout all this, she’s the main reason why I’m still here and um she got me outta there. And then I, she wanted me to go to another rehab um, up in the mountains and I agreed. And I was driven and hour and a half or so all the way up to there only to be kicked out, a few- lets say maybe like three weeks in, to be kicked out for fighting. And that was rehab number two. I’ve been to about six, um, been kicked out of two, the last one was in Florida. I thought maybe if I ran away and went far away from the main place where all this bad shit was happening and I couldn’t get set free from this demon of mine, I thought if I ran to Florida, everything would be okay but um… it wasn’t. 

I caught a plane home… sorry… and I stayed clean a little while. But it was right back to it. And my mom saved me. She broke down my door. Where I had vomit all over me, my face in the vomit on the floor. And I just, I just couldn’t do it anymore. I just surrendered. And it was hard but I’m so, I’m so grateful for where I’m at today. I really am. Cause I don’t want my mom to have to find me like that ever again. While my son is sleeping in the other room I rush to go do that like? It was a whole process, we moved my back room all the way up to her side of the house and now my room is next to her’s cause she’s so scared and she loves me. I have a lot of guilt that I’m working through but I don’t wanna, I don’t wanna feel like I used to anymore and I don’t wanna to hurt her anymore cause she’s sacrificed so much for me. I don’t want to feel dead anymore.


Anonymous Portrait no. 2, 2018.

Part Two Audio Player

00:00

00:00

I don’t wanna like play the whole ‘daddy card,’ like I said I’m still working on that with my therapist. But like a lot of it, we discovered, me and my therapist, is the feeling of feeling unwanted, um not feeling loved, feeling, ugly, but mostly unwanted. My dad left when I was young and like I didn’t have a dad until I was about seven years old. So that void was there. And now I have my step dad who is like- he, he is my real dad. I love him. Um, but it hurts to not feel wanted, especially as a kid. And it’s not my moms fault. Um… but on top of that I was teased a lot, um I was called ugly, um… I was made fun of about my looks. Um… I was, I don’t know if I can say this but, white and black people used to call me ‘nigger nose’ because of my nose… Um… I’ve considered surgery, like… little things that may seem petty to people… You don’t know what we’ve been through. Or how we feel. Or how ugly we feel, you don’t know. So I was bullied a lot um… and I guess thats part of where my trauma started. And uh, I’m happy that I never did do any surgeries or anything because throughout all this I’ve learned that I’m beautiful just the way that I am. And if someone doesn’t like me, that’s okay because someone else will like me, someone else will love me, someone else will think I’m beautiful. But… even though I’ve moved past it, it still hurts. So that’s what I’m trying to work on right now. So that’s the trauma, that’s why I say I think it does go a lot deeper than just drug abuse, there’s something in all of us, some type of void, some, some hole that’s bigger than that other hole, you know. 

The drugs and the alcohol made me feel beautiful and it was a lie. It was a lie because it was helping me to cope. 

And now I’m clean and I’m starting to be okay with myself because I’m putting the work in with myself. Not just sitting at home twiddling my thumbs waiting for a change. I’m making that change. You know, um, I’ve been out of work two months. After interview, after interview, after interview, after no, after no, after no, I finally got a Yes! And a salary increase and benefits and a full time job and this is just one prime example of you accepting yourself, you loving yourself and you putting that work in to change to be the better person that you know you want to be.

I reached out because I try to stay humble and I try not to forget where I was. You want to remember and look forward to where you’re going but try not to forget where you’ve been because that kinda makes you who you are. And so sometimes I’ll read and I’ll google up on like ‘heroin news’ or uh ‘Kensington news’ to remind myself of where I don’t wanna be because any time I do read on it or if I’m craving and I read on it- it’s strange, like I said, you gotta figure out what works for you. Like, who would wanna read on it and that helps them heal? Well, that’s what helps me. Reading on it, and seeing people that have like, like the skin problems, or teeth falling out, like, I don’t wanna be there ever again, you know, the track marks, the people nodding off on the buses like, damn, I don’t wanna be there. So then my craving, that I was craving for a little bit, it goes away, because yes, for that instant little high, look what you’re gonna have to sacrifice for it. And it’s like, ‘What the heck? No, I don’t want to do that.’ So I’m like you just gotta play the tape through. All these terminologies from the rooms and this and therapy and rehabs, it’s starting to click. And maybe it’s because I’ve heard it over and over and over again but I don’t know, I’m just trying to figure it out and stay aware.

Anonymous Portrait no. 3, 2018.

RIP: Debbie Lynn McConnell

Debbie McConnell stands with her mother Laura Bailey Talbert in front of a wall of family photos at their home in Staunton, VA 2017.

Deborah Lynn McConnell, 38, of Fairfax County, passed away unexpectedly Saturday, August 4, 2018 in Baltimore, Maryland. Her body was found at the corner of Willard and Hollins Streets in West Baltimore.

The manner of death is undetermined however the medical examiner reports that Fentanyl was found in Debbie’s system.

Debbie was found on August 4th but her family wasn’t notified of her death for an agonizing 7 days, during which time her mother frantically searched the streets of Baltimore and struggled to get her on the Missing Persons List.

Debbie was born August 12, 1979 in Chester, Pennsylvania, a daughter of Laura Bailey Talbert, William and Christine McConnell.

Although Debbie struggled with drugs throughout most of her teenage and adult life, she was also able to maintain extended periods of clean time. Most recently, from 2013 to 2017, Debbie was living drug free at home with her mother in Staunton, Virginia.

In addition to her parents, family members include daughter Cheyenne McConnell, of Staunton, son, Joshua Biondo of Maine, four sisters, Jamie (Richard) Sullivan of Staunton, Gina McConnell of Pennsylvania, Cara (Evan) Yocano of Pennsylvania and Audria McConnell of Pennsylvania, two brothers, Theodore Manna of Staunton and Tyler Manna of Staunton. Numerous nieces, nephews, aunts, uncles and cousins. She was preceded in death by a sister Megan Lynn Manna.

A cremation will be conducted by Simplicity Crematorium and Funeral Home. The memorial service is scheduled to take place on October 20th, 2018 at 1pm at Friendship Church, 1601 W Beverley St. Staunton, Va. 24401.

Laura Bailey Talbert writes, “We would love it, if everyone wore something “GREEN” 💚💚 that was her favorite color or sport your Philadelphia 🦅Eagles pride. That would be great.
She would love that. She missed her birthday by 9 days 😰. So we will be having a 🎉BIRTHDAY CELEBRATION PARTY🎉 after the Church memorial service.


The following letter was written by Debbie’s mother, Laura Bailey Talbert.

Dear mothers and daughters,

Like always, we think we have taught them all we can to protect themselves from this great big world… And then we find ourselves wondering what went wrong? 

My daughter was the kindest person in this world. She was my best friend and co-pilot in life. She began early in life, getting into some legal problems, and it quickly became the drug scene. She was so bad into them, I asked her to tattoo my phone number on her so if she was found they wouldn’t have any problems getting ahold of me. And if she was in jail, I knew she was safe. Three meals daily and clean. She had been to several rehabs to no avail. I was always on pins and needles when the phone rang, knowing that it would be bad news about Debbie. She had been on the avenue for quite some time. I would go walk the streets to find her. Begging for her to come home, making sure she had clothes, shoes…..sometimes I have even given her money to buy what she needed to get her in the car and bring her home.  

You have to understand our relationship:  we were the best of friends but as her mom there was a line in the sand. She knew disrespect was not an option. There came a time she got into some serious trouble and I would not bail her out. I told her that was it‼️ And that was that. She was on her own. I couldn’t just keep living her demons. We had not spoken for three years. Then her sister passed away at 29 and I had to go tell her that face to face 😢 😢 and that started our relationship over again. But Debbie had a different outlook on life & family after that.❤ We visited, talked, and had quality time to figure out what path we were going to take. Things just fell into place 😇 and our relationship got to the point that I trusted her again. 

When Debbie was released, (the last time she ever went to jail) 😇 🌹 I think the death of her younger-sister really made her think & she chose her family. I trusted her and let her come home. We have always been close. But the drugs masked the “BEAUTIFUL” (my nickname for her) person she was inside. I’m sure all of you mom’s out there going through this, know exactly what I mean… 🌹 You still see your little girl in her eyes but her appearance was not the girl you knew at all.  

To the daughter’s out there who are still on the avenue, or wherever you are, please know, that no matter what, your mom loves you with all she has ❤.
Or a family member, who has been a mom to you🌹.

We’ll never give up looking for you, even if you think that’s the case 💚.  If you haven’t called home, please do so 🙏😇 because the person on the other end, loves you, needs you and will help you. They just need to know your alive ✨💚 and to hear your voice, will be the best day of their lives 🍀.  Because they pray everyday for that 🙏🙏😇.  And know there is a chance to save their babies. Call your mom please 🙏🙏. You’re both feeling the same way, just on opposite sides: lost 💚 lonely 💚 scared 💚 a hole in your ❤ where each of you belong, and can only be filled by hearing each others voices. Because I know the pain, sleepless nights, uncontrollable emotions that comes with not hearing my (BEAUTIFUL) daughter’s voice ever again 💔😢.

Debbie was clean for years after she was released from jail. Together we got her back on track. Alimentally (she had to do the work herself) but knew she had a family that loved her💚a cheerleader mom💚who at times was pretty tough on her😘, but always had her back💚. There were times she would tell me to back off, she was a grown woman and didn’t need me to be a mom🙄🙄. But I’m fierce as a mom‼️

And Debbie did not always make the best choices, when it came to men & friends😐. If she had a date and I didn’t like the on line dating thing anyway because people are not going to tell you their real story… And when it came to Deb she almost always believed what anyone told her 😱. So I would sneak out take a picture of the car and plates so if I didn’t hear from her, I knew I could track down the person she went on a date with📸

One day she needed my phone, and was scrolling thru my pictures 😱 and discovered the pictures I had taken of the cars😜. At first she was like (MOM REALLY)‼️ I said “YUPPERS”. No one is going to take you away from me‼️ I brought you into this world, and I’m the only one who gets to take you out‼️ We laughed our asses off….. to the point of tears 😄😂😅. She hugged me and said “ONLY YOU WOULD THINK TO DO THAT” 💚💚💚 and maybe that was true 😍💚😇 but I’m sure that all of the moms out there, that have walked the streets of addiction to hell and 🍀 enough to find their daughters, have done something like that. So they knew where to start if their daughters were not home by the next day ✨✨.

Debbie and I were very close, co-pilots, partners in crime, best friends. We could finish each other’s sentences. We were rock stars in the car, singing & being silly. There was not a subject we couldn’t talk about (but had to remind her occasionally) that there are somethings I didn’t need to know as her mom 😱. She didn’t care…. She said we’re both grown women, and you’re the only one I tell everything too 😍.
We went and did everything together.

But she needed her own life also. She didn’t like that she couldn’t have overnight company, a house rule but respectful, and to set the example I never had anyone over, or spent the night. We had some pretty heated argument at times. Mostly because I didn’t like the people she was hanging out with. Because I could see she was being used by these people….. I knew she would be the child that was always going to live at home, because she spent more time of her life in the system & on drugs. She struggled with how to conform to the rules and ways of communicating with the outside world. She said what was on her mind, no matter who she spoke too. It was difficult for her to keep a job, because she would call you out if you were not doing your share of the work, and it always came out like she was being bitchy, because of her tone. And 99% of the time she was just trying to express her opinion, not in a mean or nasty way but in the only way she knew how– blunt & to the point.

In November of 2017. She met a man and moved in with him. She lived just 1 mile from me so we talked and texted everyday. It was like she lived at home but slept there 😂😇. We had coffee together most days. Nothing really changed except her address 😂. She had slipped up a time or 2 but came clean to me about it and we found a doctor to help and went to a meeting. I went with her sometimes when she wanted me to so she knew I was in her corner 💯% of the time. But in March I saw the change in her eyes…. New names popped up?? And communication was only text & she was becoming distant. I went to her house to see her and knew immediately that she getting high again. I called her out about it and she told me it was the Suboxone and Seroquel that she was prescribed that was making her loopy. Her boyfriend was evicting her, she was out of control, in trouble and needed to get help immediately‼️‼️. And she knew it. We talked about it and found a place for her right away. But the day we were to go she had a million excuses to put it off. So I went to her house, packed up the rest of her things, put them in the car and said “LETS GO.” She said she wasn’t going, she was a grown woman & I couldn’t make her go‼️ I said I trump that because I’m the mom‼ and could care less how old she was‼

She needed cigarettes, but I refused to move my car so she could not get her car out. I said fine get in the car I will take you to get cigarettes and bring you home. If you want to throw away all your hard work over the years that gave you your family & life back, so be it. But I’m not going to watch you go down that road. She was withdrawing and a bitch on wheels because at that point so was I‼️‼️ I couldn’t & wouldn’t let her fall down that rabbit hole again. So she got in the car. We went to the store. And I just started to head for the rehab she was going to. To say that she was not happy was an understatement. She was pissed I tricked her 😡. But she would have to get over it. We arrived. I unpacked the car and told her she either goes in and gets with the program or she could sit outside. Either way I was going home without her. She got up, and asked me to go in with her 😇💚. She knew she needed help and I was so proud of her. And told her that she did so well and looked as “BEAUTIFUL” as ever. She even extended it for 2 extra weeks. She liked the area she was at because there were people her age, more things to do. She came home to get her car and her things that were here. She found a place to live, worked a crappy job to pay her rent, but continued to look for something better 💚🎉. She had been living in Northern Virginia for 3 months by now and was very proud 💚she was clean 💚 living on her own 💚 making her own money 💚.  And I was very proud of her for really giving it her all 💚❤.

I became very ill in July and it was a touch and go situation but I pulled through it and told Debbie she had nothing to worry about. She needed to work. That I was good to go. Then a week later I was back in the hospital 😱. Wild horses couldn’t keep her away this time. She came to the hospital to see for herself, that I was TRUELY going to be ok ❤❤. She had to get back to work though but came home on July 31st because she had a court date on the 1st of August. It was nice having her home for a few days. I was still not 100% well so she was in nursing mode 😱 making me crazy. I couldn’t move at all without her following me, making sure I wasn’t doing anything 😂😇💚.

Debbie left to go home on the 3rd…. With plans to be back for her birthday on the 12th. I gave her kisses and hugs and for her to let me know she made it home safe. She sent me a text around 8pm.  She made it home ok………💔 that would be the last time I would ever hear from her‼️‼️

I text her the next day & she didn’t answer?  I thought she was sleeping in. She mentioned something about Baltimore before she left my house to go home but didn’t elaborate so I didn’t know if she went out or not at this point. I called and texted her all day & nothing. Not like her at all, we communicated 10x’s a day or more. I was concerned that I didn’t hear from her at all on Saturday. Sunday I was calling and texting 😱 still nothing. I was in panic mode, something was wrong I could feel it.  Every Mom has that built in mechanism that you feel it when your child is in trouble‼️ I called her roommate and she said she was concerned also because she had been trying to get ahold of her also. She last heard from her was at 3am on Sunday and Debbie was in Baltimore then.

Clearly Debbie had not returned any messages, her phone went right to voicemail. She would never leave without her make-up if she was not coming home‼️ I called the police to do a safety check on her, however, they did nothing. She was old enough to go where she wanted, did not have to tell anyone, so the Fairfax police would do nothing. I called for a second safety check, this time her roommate was there. She told them the last time she communicated Debbie, she reiterated what I had been explaining to them that Debbie wouldn’t leave for 3 days without taking some things with her. Her car, clothes, make-up, toothbrush…. everything was at her house but her‼️‼️

So at the 2nd check the police said they could not search the car without a warrant (REALLY‼️). She is missing, 2 calls to check on her, and they needed a search warrant even though I gave them permission‼️‼️ So while the police were there, Debbie’s roommate searched the car and her ID wallet and a receipt from McDonald’s was found inside‼️‼️ So clearly she was a missing person‼️

FOR ALL OF THE MOMS OUT THERE THAT KNOW WHAT THAT SICK FEELING IS TELLING YOU, THAT YOU KNOW THE OUTCOME BUT WILL NEVER STOP LOOKING, BECAUSE YOU NEED TO SEE IT TO BELIEVE IT‼️ Three of my sisters all turned into private detectives, and were relentless in calling everyplace in Baltimore to see if she was hurt or….anyplace they could think of.

We tried like hell to get her on the missing persons list. Fairfax wouldn’t do it because they suck and are lazy. They said it had to come from where I live because I was making the report. At this point I was going to call the national guards if that’s what it took to make someone get off their ass and listen to the facts. Her sister had had enough of the BS and come hell or high water was getting her on the Missing list. And she did‼️‼I have no idea how she worked that miracle but she was an angel with powers that be. So we know Debbie was in Baltimore and still missing. Me, Debbie’s sister and brother walked the streets in search of anything we could find out. To no avail. No one there wants to talk. But we were not deterred. We kept asking. And we found the woman that found Debbie. So when the police showed up at my house, we at least knew where she was at. AND WOULD HAVE KNOWN SOONER IF DETECTIVE MASON HAD GOT OFF HIS ASS and went to Baltimore to identify her the first time 😡 the coroner called him. She did a tremendous job & research. She found my news cast and Debbie’s picture in the Kensington Blues book. She called detective mason again and told him she had my baby and he had to come identify her.  But he blew her off again so she made a call…. and poof. There he was. Identified her and washed his hands of it.

I could go on and on…

Moms alway be there for your daughter. Keep the lines of communications open, that’s so important 🙏.

And go & get her out of the hell hole even if you just don’t know what to do to get out. But you need to be the one to find her and be patient, it’s a struggle. Please don’t give up.

We had a great relationship before she was taken from me 🙏💚‼️😇❤.

For the moms out there your daughter is looking for you to find her, love her and help her get through issues. I feel 🍀💚 to have had years of clean time to really know her as a person 💚.

I love you my “BEAUTIFUL” baby.

Sincerely,

Laura Bailey Talbert

Welcome to Kensington Avenue, Philadelphia.

Between 2008 and 2014 Photographer Reveals The “Addicted” Side Of The Streets in Philadelphia

You should see it now.

Kensington Avenue in North Philadelphia is infamous for drug abuse and prostitution. The Avenue runs 3 miles through what is now a dangerous and crime-ridden neighborhood. Kensington Blues is a photography series by Jeffrey Stockbridge, 36, that documented the struggles and the dark reality of local residents.

Between 2008 and 2014, the photographer took a series of intimate portraits of people capturing a side of Philadelphia that is rarely seen or talked about. The residents shared their stories, talking about drugs, prostitution and other struggles of their lives.

“The goal of my work is to enable people to relate to one another in a fundamentally human way, despite any commonly perceived differences”- Jeffrey shared on his website. “I rely on the trust and sincerity of those I photograph to help me in this process.”

Take a look at the powerful images below.

More info: kensingtonblues.com

There are a total of 44 photos in this article of the people on Kensington Avenue. Please take the time to look at them. They are very powerful images

Al

Al lives in a house off Kensington Avenue without electricity or running water. He sometimes rents his upstairs bedroom to prostitutes in need of a private location for engaging in sex and drug use

Sarah

“I’m 55 years old, I have a master’s degree in psychology, but after my husband, mother and father, died in a car accident two years ago, I lost my whole family, my career, one, my health, all in one go.”

The Twins Tic Tac And Tootsie

“We out here so we can get money so we has somewhere to rest our heads. We look out for each other. If I can’t get money, she gets it, and whatever money we get we share…We need quick money cause we need somewhere to sleep every day. I mean, trust me, we don’t want to be out here doing this. This is the last thing I want to do. But I do what I have to do to take care of my sister. Cause she’s all I got and I’m all she’s got.”

Pat And Rachel

They still have children, whom they gave away to a special agency for their protection. “We gave the kids away, people say it’s a selfish act, but I think it’s the best I could do for their better future,” Rachel said.

Carroll

She told that she often sleeps on the streets during the day to protect herself at night.

Jamie

“I’ve been raped, and, you know, almost killed really”

Bob

No info on Bob

Tanya

She was 25 years old at the time this photo was taken (between 2008 and 2014). At that time she had been working in the sex industry since she was 18.

Carol

A local resident, at the time she was 41. Carol told the photographer that she had been doing heroin for 21 years and it became “the love of her life”.

Mary

“I don’t just do this for drugs. I do this because I wanna eat, because I like to buy clothes, because I like the small things, you know. I did have a normal life once but…I really believe, like if my, if my family say like, “Mary come, come home stay with us” like, if I could I would…”

Sarah And Dennis

The veins in Sarah’s arms were no good for injection, so she asked Dennis for the drug to be injected to her neck

Continue reading “Welcome to Kensington Avenue, Philadelphia.”

Flashback: Gov. Wolf questioned about March 2020 memo on Pa. COVID nursing home deaths

We will NEVER FORGET

Tragedy Within The Nursing Homes

By TxTrailblazer 

thetrailblazingpatriot.wordpress.com

2 min

May 2, 2021

HARRISBURG, Pa. (WHTM) — New calls on Wednesday for an investigation into how the state dealt with nursing homes at the beginning of the pandemic. And abc27 Capitol Reporter Dennis Owens asked Governor Wolf about a memo at the center of the storm.

Early in the pandemic, nearly 70% of COVID deaths were in nursing homes. Senator John Yudichak (I-Luzerne, Carbon) wants the Auditor General to investigate the state.

“Were decisions made that were inappropriate?” Senator Yudichak said. “Were they given bad guidance? Were they not given the state resources they needed to protect lives?

Especially concerning is a March 2020 memo to nursing homes from the Pa. Department of Health, stating, “Nursing care facilities must continue to accept new admissions” with coronavirus.

Owens asked the Governor about it.

“We didn’t want people to stay in the hospital because we were concerned about hospital capacity,” Gov. Wolf said.

Yudichak says the logic behind the decision to “overwhelm” long-term care facilities doesn’t add up.

“Think of what you’re doing you’re worried about overwhelming the hospitals, so we’re going to overwhelm nursing facilities which are usually underresourced and understaffed,” Yudichak said.

Wolf says it’s bigger than just a decision made by the state health department.

“I think the Department of Health was just following what the federal government was telling us to do,” Gov. Wolf said.

But that’s not exactly correct. While Pa. said nursing homes “must” accept COVID-positive seniors with proper precautions, the CDC guidance said a nursing home “can” accept a resident diagnosed with COVID-19.

It also says, “nursing homes should admit any individuals that they would normally admit.” But not must.

The governor’s spokeswoman also notes that no nursing home has come forward and said they were forced to take covid positive patients by the state’s policy and that directly led to increased deaths.

Owens pressed the Governor on the distinction.

“I’m not sure. I just don’t know,” Gov. Wolf said.

Rep. Zach Mako (R-Lehigh, Northampton) isn’t so sure about the Governor’s uncertainty.

“I would think the Governor would know. That’s a little surprising I’d say. Who’s really running the show?” Mako said.

Especially surprising because in budget hearings the health secretary was grilled over the March 18 guidance. And the House referenced it in announcing its own investigation.

“He should have the answers and he should know this and should be talking to his secretaries,” Mako said.

Yudichak agrees.

“We had staffers in these agencies making decisions without the Governor in the room. That is not an excuse. You have to show up for work and do the job,” Yudichak said.

Both the Governor and his spokeswoman reiterated that their guidance absolutely required nursing homes to follow proper safety protocols to keep residents safe.

How COVID Policies and Party Politics Set the Stage for the Protests in China

The New Yorker

How COVID Policies and Party Politics Set the Stage for the Protests in China

Frustrations with Xi Jinping’s harsh approach to the virus have led to the most widespread public demonstrations in decades.

By 

November 30, 2022

Earlier this month, at least ten people were killed after a fire broke out in an apartment building in the Xinjiang region of western China. Rumors emerged that the rescue effort was hampered by President Xi Jinping’s extreme covid restrictions; the government denied this, but protests sprouted up all over the country. Xi, who recently began his third term as the head of the Chinese Communist Party, has amassed the most power of any Chinese leader in at least a generation. He has also centralized control in the Party leadership, which now consists almost entirely of his allies. But his “zero covid” policy, which has limited deaths from the virus, has also brought large areas of the country to a virtual standstill—and has now sparked the most dissent of his decade-long tenure.

I recently spoke by phone about the protests with Tony Saich, a scholar of China and a professor of international affairs at Harvard’s Kennedy School of Government. He is also the author of “From Rebel to Ruler: One Hundred Years of the Chinese Communist Party.” During our conversation, which has been edited for length and clarity, we discussed what distinguishes these protests from previous movements in Chinese history, why Xi has been so insistent on the “zero covid” policy, and the risks for the Chinese leadership that would accompany any real change of course.

How shocking are these protests given the context of Xi’s time in power?

Demonstrations in China are a daily affair. What is shocking, though, is that people are protesting across the country around the same question. The normal demonstrations in China are really very local affairs: nonpayment of wages, abuses, whatever. So, this is really extraordinary in the sense that they are responding to the fire in Xinjiang, and this has created, across multiple cities and universities, protests around the same issue. That is surprising.

Why do you think that the Chinese Communist Party and Xi Jinping pursued this policy so strenuously? Why was there this seemingly extraordinary seriousness around the idea of “zero covid”?

The first reason is that this policy is so closely associated with Xi Jinping himself, which makes it very difficult to undertake any radical shifts or dramatic changes.

Second, of course, is that those further down the administrative ladder in the Chinese system want to please their superiors. And so, often, you get an overreaction by local officials in areas where one covid case pops up. Immediately, because of fear of retribution from higher authorities, they feel it’s safer just to shut everything down rather than be caught out by an expansion of the infections.

Third, I think that the leadership has just not worked out a coherent way to move on from this policy. They’ve invested so heavily in the mantra of, We’re saving lives, whereas the West is not focussed on saving lives. At the same time, they really haven’t invested sufficiently in alternatives that would get them out from under this problem.

Vaccines have been slow to roll out. People over sixty, the most vulnerable, did not have very high rates of vaccination. And, as we know, vaccine nationalism has meant that they’ve refused to use the most effective vaccines, which have been adopted globally. Given that background, the Communist Party is really trapped in a nightmare situation where it doesn’t know how to move forward, and that just results in these random lockdowns, which have created frustration and uncertainty among the Chinese population.

Why do you think that this policy was so important in the first place? Why was there such an investment in it, given that most of the rest of the world has gone in a different direction?

Look at the direction a lot of countries took initially as a response to the pandemic. A number of countries in the Asia-Pacific really tried to close the borders and attempted savage lockdowns: Australia, New Zealand, and Taiwan, for example. So, to start with, it wasn’t that unusual.

I think the problem for China was threefold.

First, their rural health system is extremely weak. Had infections taken off in the countryside, the health system would’ve been totally overwhelmed and unable to cope, and I think we would’ve been looking at millions of deaths.

Secondly, as I just mentioned, the vaccine nationalism has meant that they’ve been very ambivalent about bringing in vaccines from the international market—ones that we know are more effective.

And, thirdly, they’ve not been very good at promoting vaccinations among those who are the most vulnerable.

Some critics have asked, “Why hasn’t China invested in a better vaccination rollout?” Instead, it’s been investing in mass-testing sites and quarantine centers. The answer that I’ve heard coming from people in China is: there’s more of a possibility to make money. There are profits to be made by certain groups off the mass-testing process and the construction of quarantine centers.

VIDEO FROM THE NEW YORKER

A New Wave of Asian American Creatives Discuss the Necessity of Exploring Identity

O.K., but do you understand why a very effective authoritarian regime can’t just get more older people vaccinated? I never understood why they didn’t have the state capacity to do that by force, if necessary.

The point is that they do have the state capacity to do that, and they chose not to. Early on, there was a conscious decision that the elderly would not go out, and that they were therefore not a priority for vaccination. China didn’t have very effective vaccines, so that also made it somewhat more problematic. And, if this was going to be a public-health provision provided free for citizens, who’s making the money? They certainly had the capacity to vaccinate all the elderly people. They made a decision not to.

I understand the vaccine nationalism, but, given the alternatives, why not just take the P.R. hit and buy Western vaccines?

Starting that now would not only create a public-relations problem; it would, I think, create a problem of credibility. Chinese people have been sold a particular story for a long period of time. Now, if it were accepted that Western vaccines are more effective, that might lead people to say, “Well, is the West now doing better on other measures and in other areas?”

How do these protests compare with past movements against the Communist regime?

Personally, I haven’t seen any other set of protests that are really like this. These aren’t on the scale and don’t have the same concerns as the big demonstrations of 1989, or even the student demonstrations that happened two or three years before. We are in an unusual situation. What is most interesting in our context is that these protests are clearly pushing back against problems that the Party has created for itself because of its policy choices. And that is very distinct from the kinds of demands that were made in 1989.

You could say, I suppose, that it was Party policy, the moral corrosion of the system, etc., that people were pushing back against in 1989. But the protests happening now are different in that they have a very specific policy focus to them; this makes it easier in a way to mobilize people because, with some exceptions, they’re not really attacking the system as such.

In 1989, there was a fundamental critique of the rule of the Chinese Communist Party and a push against the corruption that vested interests were participating in. And, eventually, that evolved into calls for a more democratic system. Although there have been some slogans about Xi Jinping stepping down, and people in the Party stepping down, the current protests don’t seem to translate into a critique of the way the system works. For a large number of people, it’s just frustration with the randomness and unpredictability of the lockdowns.

You touched on this briefly when you said that local officials have been cracking down in hope of pleasing the central government, and your book was so interesting on this subject of how much autonomy was given, or not given, to local officials over time. How do you think Xi fits into broader Communist Party history in terms of giving autonomy to local officials, and how has that manifested itself here?

It’s always been quite clear that under Xi Jinping there has been a huge attempt to recentralize control over the local apparatuses, and the nature of the lockdowns shows this. I mean, goodness knows how many there’ve been now. Were all the lockdowns necessary? I think the answer is probably no.

Local officials feeling the heat from above are going to move much more quickly to impose a lockdown than perhaps they might have fifteen years ago. One of the keys ways China can move beyond a policy of such randomness is by allowing more flexible responses for local officials to deal with outbreaks. If there’s just one infection, do you really need to start shutting down whole blocks of the city? But, under the much more centralized system of Xi, whether other leaders will permit that is an open question.

At the recent Chinese Communist Party Congress, Xi made clear that he was going to be the country’s leader for the foreseeable future. Do you think that might have had some effect on the protests we’re seeing now?

Yeah, I think a lot of frustration has built up in China. Particularly in some of the major urban centers, and also in the universities. It’s not just because of what we’ve seen in the rule of Xi Jinping. It really does relate to what’s happening with covid policy—people, obviously, are more aware that the rest of the world is now dealing with covid and opening up. Once you open that little valve, all kinds of other frustrations come bubbling out as well. It’s probably letting off steam for people who are frustrated with a number of different things.

You mentioned earlier that the Party had not been able to use propaganda effectively to promote vaccinations. People tend to think that the Party uses propaganda expertly. How do you see that discrepancy?

It was extremely defective at the start. After the outbreak in Wuhan, we saw, initially, tremendous citizen dissatisfaction with government performance and outrage online. Then the Party propaganda apparatus went into full swing, and began to show what was happening in other countries around the world—particularly, of course, in the United States. And that meant that they were able to control the message again, and to reassert their authority through the propaganda system by talking about saving lives, and not making profits, etc.

That message has been harder to maintain as citizens became frustrated with the duration of this policy and its randomness. You might get on a bus, go to a different part of town, and find yourself not able to get back home again because it’s suddenly locked down. That is just creating more and more frustration. Secondly, there is the factor of more information coming into China, showing that other countries are finding ways to live with covid and move forward. It’s also instructive that, with some of the World Cup soccer games, Chinese television has been somewhat reticent to show large unmasked crowds.

Is there any sense that these protests and the failures of the “zero covid” policy will lead to alternate power centers within the C.C.P.?

I think Xi Jinping has such a tight grip over the key apparatuses in China: intelligence, the propaganda organization. He’s eradicated opposition in any spheres where they might have policy influence, and he has surrounded himself with a very loyal leadership. Given that structure, it’s hard to see where any organized opposition could really come from, unless things really deteriorate terribly. And, remember, if we go back to 1989, the real issue then was that the élite Party leadership itself fell out over how to deal with the escalating demonstrations, which really prolonged them and led to a much more chaotic and catastrophic situation. Those different views have not gone away. It’s just that Xi Jinping decided it’s not necessary for them to be represented among policymakers.

What would signal to you that the protests have taken on a new degree of importance or significance?

You can see that the Party is already beginning to respond. It’s suggesting that students go home early and offering them free transport. The Party itself is really nervous about the university campuses. It would be notable if those protests were to continue, and spread further, and, as I mentioned before, shift toward more fundamental critiques of the system rather than complaints about the lockdown programs.

Secondly, I’ll simply be looking at duration. Will people be cowed into going back off the street? I think the Party is probably hoping that, after telling students to go home, making a few arrests, maybe employing a little bit of violence here and there, the demonstrations will fizzle out and they can reassert control.

Our conversation makes me think that Xi is just going to try to power forward without making any big changes in strategy, and thus hope that the regime can survive this, and that things will be O.K. Taking any sort of drastic measure in terms of policy change will present too many risks for him.

I think that’s right. I mean, he can’t afford to make any radical shifts of policy now, because it will undermine his own credibility and therefore his legitimacy. But we will see the Party thinking hard about all the demonstrations and ways that it can appear to moderate policy to mitigate some of these worst impacts that people are concerned about: the irrationality of the policies, and the lack of logic about when things shut down. And, once these demonstrations have died down, or have been dealt with, they will look to tweak the policy around the edges. ♦

More New Yorker Conversations

In Conversation

Q. & A.

More New Yorker Conversations

Sign up for our daily newsletter to receive the best stories from The New Yorker.

Isaac Chotiner is a staff writer at The New Yorker, where he is the principal contributor to Q. & A., a series of interviews with public figures in politics, media, books, business, technology, and more.

More:Covid-19CoronavirusXi JinpingChinaProtestsAuthoritarianism

The Daily

The best of The New Yorker, every day, in your in-box, plus occasional alerts when we publish major stories.

E-mail addressSign up

By signing up, you agree to our User Agreement and Privacy Policy & Cookie Statement.Read More

annals-of-inquiryHow the War in Ukraine Might EndIn recent years, a small group of scholars has focussed on war-termination theory. They see reason to fear the possible outcomes in Ukraine.By Keith GessencommentWe’re Not Going Back to the Time Before Roe. We’re Going Somewhere WorseWe are entering an era not just of unsafe abortions but of the widespread criminalization of pregnancy.By Jia Tolentinoa-reporter-at-largeState Legislatures Are Torching DemocracyEven in moderate places like Ohio, gerrymandering has let unchecked Republicans pass extremist laws that could never make it through Congress.By Jane Mayerhttps://c2d9077cdb504e225b36cbb829d7d471.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

Woman reading a book and The New Yorker magazine

Holiday SaleSubscribe for $29.99 $6, plus get a free tote.SubscribeCancel anytime.SectionsNewsBooks & CultureFiction & PoetryHumor & CartoonsMagazineCrosswordVideoPodcastsArchiveGoings OnMoreCustomer CareShop The New YorkerBuy Covers and CartoonsCondé Nast StoreDigital AccessNewslettersJigsaw PuzzleRSSAboutCareersContactF.A.Q.Media KitPressAccessibility HelpCondé Nast Spotlight© 2022 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement and Your California Privacy Rights. The New Yorker may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad ChoicesDo Not Sell My Personal Info

Sign up for our daily newsletter to receive the best stories from The New Yorker.

Isaac Chotiner is a staff writer at The New Yorker, where he is the principal contributor to Q. & A., a series of interviews with public figures in politics, media, books, business, technology, and more.

More:Covid-19CoronavirusXi JinpingChinaProtestsAuthoritarianism

The Daily

The best of The New Yorker, every day, in your in-box, plus occasional alerts when we publish major stories.

E-mail addressSign up

By signing up, you agree to our User Agreement and Privacy Policy & Cookie Statement.Read More

annals-of-inquiryHow the War in Ukraine Might EndIn recent years, a small group of scholars has focussed on war-termination theory. They see reason to fear the possible outcomes in Ukraine.By Keith GessencommentWe’re Not Going Back to the Time Before Roe. We’re Going Somewhere WorseWe are entering an era not just of unsafe abortions but of the widespread criminalization of pregnancy.By Jia Tolentinoa-reporter-at-largeState Legislatures Are Torching DemocracyEven in moderate places like Ohio, gerrymandering has let unchecked Republicans pass extremist laws that could never make it through Congress.By Jane Mayerhttps://c2d9077cdb504e225b36cbb829d7d471.safeframe.googlesyndication.com/safeframe/1-0-40/html/container.html

Woman reading a book and The New Yorker magazine

Holiday SaleSubscribe for $29.99 $6, plus get a free tote.SubscribeCancel anytime.SectionsNewsBooks & CultureFiction & PoetryHumor & CartoonsMagazineCrosswordVideoPodcastsArchiveGoings OnMoreCustomer CareShop The New YorkerBuy Covers and CartoonsCondé Nast StoreDigital AccessNewslettersJigsaw PuzzleRSSAboutCareersContactF.A.Q.Media KitPressAccessibility HelpCondé Nast Spotlight© 2022 Condé Nast. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy and Cookie Statement and Your California Privacy Rights. The New Yorker may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our Affiliate Partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast. Ad ChoicesDo Not Sell My Personal Info

The lesson yet again is that civil and individual rights should never be contingent upon a medical procedure.

INTRODUCTION

A minimum of 20,010 days (54 years and 10 months). That is how long the FDA proposes to take, at a rate of 500 pages per month, to produce only a portion of the documents in its file for the COVID-19 Pfizer vaccine that PHMPT requested pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act (the “FOIA Request”) and 21 C.F.R. § 601.51(e). But when it came to reviewing those same documents to license this product so that Pfizer could freely sell it to the public, the FDA took just 108 days. It took the FDA’s parent department even less time to grant Pfizer complete immunity to liability for injuries from this product, and it took a stroke of the President’s pen to mandate this product for federal employees, the private sector and military personnel.

The federal government mandating that millions of people be injected with a liability-free vaccine requires complete government transparency – not the government’s suppression of information.  PHMPT is comprised of independent scientists working at some of our nation’s premier institutions, and all they are seeking is the data the FDA has already reviewed concerning the Pfizer vaccine in order to provide the necessary peer review.  The FDA knows that they, and other independent scientists, cannot properly analyze that data until it is all released.  Yet, the FDA wants to wait until most of those scientists are long since dead to fully release the data.  News outlets, politicians, and scientists have called the FDA’s position “outrageous.”  They are correct.

The entire purpose of FOIA is government transparency.  In multiple recent cases, in upholding the FOIA’s requirement to “make the records promptly available,” courts have required agencies, including the FDA, to produce 10,000 or more pages per month, and those cases did not involve a request nearly this important – i.e., the data underlying licensure of a liability-free product that the federal government requires nearly all Americans to receive.  As the present pandemic rages on, independent review of these documents by outside scientists is urgently needed to assist with addressing the shortcomings and issues with the response to the pandemic to date.

The context surrounding PHMPT’s FOIA request is truly unprecedented, and the request should be treated as such.  Historically, there has been no consumer product that the federal government has mandated Americans to receive.  Now, it has mandated Pfizer’s vaccine to private sector employees, federal employees, the military, and more.  States have done the same at the urging of the federal government, extending mandates for people to enter schools, universities, restaurants, and public venues, among other places.  A majority of Americans are now mandated to receive this product under penalty of losing a job or worse.  This is truly unparalleled in the nation’s past.  There has never been such a large-scale mandate of any product for society, let alone one that is injected into people.  Even school mandates under state laws have almost always included an easy to obtain exemption.  The current inability to say “no” to injecting a product into one’s body absent serious consequences dictated by the government is truly unprecedented.

Making this even more unprecedented is that Americans, if injured, cannot sue Pfizer and otherwise have no recourse.  There is virtually no other product where a consumer is prohibited from suing the company that manufactures, markets, and profits from the product.  Decoupling a company’s profit interest from its interest in safety is a moral hazard, and a departure from centuries of product liability doctrine.  Yet we find ourselves in this truly extraordinary circumstance where not only must Americans take this product under penalty of expulsion from work, school, the military and civil life, but they cannot sue Pfizer for any resulting injuries.

And who has created this unprecedented situation?  The Executive Branch, normally with little or no input from the other branches.  It has granted the immunity, licensed the product, and aggressively implemented or demanded mandates.  This therefore requires unprecedented transparency.  When Americans cannot say “no” and cannot sue Pfizer for harm, then the FDA should also not be able to say “no” to forthwith releasing the Pfizer vaccine data.  If the administration wants Americans to be subject to its mandates, Americans must at least be granted the dignity of access to the data supposedly supporting the safety and efficacy of Pfizer’s liability-free vaccine so that independent scientists can conduct a timely review.

Even President Joe Biden, when truth was original to him as candidate Joe Biden, on January 28, 2020, told the American people that, “You’ve got to make all of it [the vaccine data] available to other experts across the nation so they can look and see, so there’s a consensus this is a safe vaccine.”  On September 7, 2020, on national television, he stated:

I get asked the question, if … President [Trump] announced tomorrow we have a vaccine, would you take it? Only if it was completely transparent and other experts in the country could look at it.  Only if we knew all of what went into it.

And then he again said to the American people that we need “total transparency so scientists outside the government know exactly what is being approved.” Fifteen U.S. Senators, all caucusing Democrats, similarly stated as follows in a letter to the FDA:

Full transparency throughout the review and authorization process is thus essential to countering real or perceived politicization and building public confidence in any approved vaccine. … In addition to the efforts FDA has already made to publish its recommendations regarding data needed for clinical development and licensure of vaccines, a transparent review process will require that FDA … make the data generated by clinical trials and supporting documents submitted to the FDA by developers available to the public.

Numerous Republicans have also demanded immediate release of the documents.  For example, Congressman Ralph Norman recently stated:

The FDA’s only priority should be the health and safety of consumers. The agency has compromised its integrity by delaying information that belongs to the public. Since the Biden administration is hell-bent on forcing these vaccine mandates on us, the public has every right to know how this vaccine was approved, especially in such a short amount of time.  After all, the FDA managed to consider all 329,000 pages of data and grant emergency approval of the Pfizer vaccine within just 108 days.  So it’s hard to rationalize why it now needs 55 years to fully release that information to the public.

Senator Ted Cruz called the FDA’s position “Completely outrageous.”

The transparency sought by politicians is consistent with well-established norms in the scientific community and with the purpose of FOIA; but that purpose will be utterly frustrated unless the data is released now, in its entirety, to the public.  Releasing this data, so independent scientists can review it, is akin to getting a second opinion from a doctor, or a peer review of a scientific paper.  Every day that passes without this data’s release is another day that the American people are deprived of this basic transparency and review.

The FDA does not dispute that it should produce these documents.  Rather, it proposes doing so at a rate so slow that the documents will not be fully produced until almost all of the scientists, attorneys, and most of the Americans that received Pfizer’s product, will have died of old age.  The FDA’s excuse?  It cries it does not have the resources.  Considering how many taxpayer dollars this administration has spent on its COVID-19 response, the FDA cannot now claim it lacks the money to timely conduct its review.  This excuse is a red herring that just adds insult to the liberty-crushing approach the FDA and administration have taken with this product.

The Executive Branch gave Pfizer $1.95 billion in taxpayer funds to promote development of its vaccine through an advance-purchase agreement.  It then paid Pfizer more than $15.7 billion collected from the American people to purchase that product.  Thereafter, it spent $18.75 billion more of the American people’s money promoting that product.  Yet, when it comes to being transparent with those same American people, the FDA claims it cannot muster the resources to timely produce the same documents it reviewed for licensure in 108 days.  Just as the government found the resources for Operation Warp Speed, it must now do the same to produce these critical documents with the same warp speed.  How about the federal government spend just 0.1% of the taxpayer money it has given Pfizer – that would be at least $17.6 million – a pittance compared to the billions given to Pfizer and more than sufficient to hire enough reviewers to timely produce the documents.  Companies in private litigation produce hundreds of thousands of pages per month in discovery, reviewing each document for privilege, etc.  But yet the vast federal government, on an issue this important, claims it cannot find the resources.  A product the administration says everyone must take under penalty of exclusion from American life and for which they cannot even sue Pfizer if injured!  Whose interests is the executive branch protecting, the American people or its own?

Reflecting that the FDA can, in fact, produce documents at a far greater rate than 500 pages per month, on December 1, 2021, in an effort to avoid the hearing with this Court, it offered to produce approximately 12,658 pages, 4 .txt files, and 4 SAS files within a period of 61 days if PHMPT would agree to thereafter only receive 500 pages per month. The FDA does not appear to recognize the gravity of its ethical breach to the American people in playing these games.

The pandemic is continuing to spiral.  Despite over 83% of adults having received a COVID-19 vaccine, cases are on the rise in the most vaccinated statesvariants that evade vaccine immunity are risingthe CDC has admitted the COVID-19 vaccines do not prevent transmission , the number of breakthrough cases is increasing exponentially , and boosters are now needed for everyone and will likely continue to be required every six months, if not more frequently, among numerous other issues with the vaccine program.

America has some of the greatest institutions of learning and research the world has ever known.  We need all these hands on deck, both inside and outside the government, to address these serious, ongoing issues, and failings within the vaccine program.  Locking out independent scientists from addressing these issues is dangerous, irresponsible, and unethical.  The FDA, in both the prior and current administration, has never been free of political pressure when conducing its work and it has also been widely promoting this vaccine to the public, including before it was licensed.  This all raises questions about the licensure process and whether the FDA will admit mistakes or failings of the same product, mistakes and failings that will only be identified through outside review.  America needs independent scientists, like the ones from our premier universities and medical centers comprising Plaintiff, to review this data and assist with offering solutions and addressing these issues.  Not 55 years from now or longer.  But today.

PHMPT’s Brief & Appendix

FDA’s Brief & Appendix

*In addition to the original 329,000+ pages, the FDA discloses there is another “approximately 39,000 pages,” an additional “tens of thousands of additional pages,” and an additional 126 data files, many of which have over ten thousand rows for which the FDA intends to treat twenty rows as one page. Assuming an average of only ten thousand rows per data file, and that its amorphous “tens of thousands of additional pages” amounts to 20,000 pages, the grand total is at least 451,000 pages.

11 Curse Words From The ‘50s We Need To Bring Back

Well I’m not so sure that these are what I’d call curse words but they’re a better alternative to the real ones if you don’t want to offend people.
I thought this was cute and worth sharing … something on the lighter side for a change!

Life

BDG Media, Inc.

Charming, fun, and yet just the right amount of salty, curse words from the 1950s have a certain extra somethin’ that many modern day insults seem to lack. Our four letter words and other caustic phrases get the point across, and they certainly have a place in our vocabulary. But it can be effective to throw in the occasional “get bent” or “oh, fudge” as well.

“When you say something unexpected, you will definitely throw someone off balance — and it can lighten the moment,” relationship expert and spiritual counselor Davida Rappaport, tells Bustle. This can come in handy during heated moments, when you want to change the direction of a heated conversation.

“A lot of these terms are definitely a lot less offensive in modern times and perhaps even endearing to a certain extent,” Beverly Friedmann, writer and content manager for ReviewingThis, tells Bustle. “They also tend to catch people off-guard, can be fun to use, and may strike up a conversation.” Because nothing will get people chatting quite like using the phrase “that’s so Mickey Mouse.”

Whatever your reason, if you’d like to bring back curse words from the ’50s and other old-fashioned sayings, read on below for a few choice phrases, so you’ll know just what to say the next time you’re angry, annoyed, or surprised.

1

“Get Bent”

Back in the day, telling someone to “get bent” basically meant you wanted them to drop dead, Friedmann says. It was super popular in the 1950s, but isn’t something you hear much today.

“One of the most interesting parts of this 1950s curse/slang term is how language has evolved throughout time,” she says. “If you told someone to ‘get bent’ today on the street, you probably wouldn’t have any problems.” It does, however, have a certain flair to it. And may be something we want to bring back.

2

“Oh, Fudge”

Nothing sounds more old-school than saying “oh, fudge” instead of the usual four letter word, as was tradition back in the day. “Many people used to say, ‘oh, fudge’ because it was a bit more polite and in many cases, their intent would be known without causing offense,” Rappaport says.

3

“Scram!”

Back in the ’50s, if someone was pushing your buttons, telling them to “scram” was a forceful, yet effective, way to get them out of your face.

“The word ‘scram’ was introduced in the late 1920s, but was very popular in the 1950s when teenagers used to tell their younger siblings or anyone they did not want having around to leave,” Rappaport says.

4

“Make Like A Tree And Leave”

If you want someone to get out of your face, try saying “why don’t you make like a tree and leave?” This fun play on words was meant as an insult back in the ’50s, Rappaport says, but was just a little bit nicer than straight up telling someone to go.

5

“Knuckle Sandwich”

Telling someone you were going to give them a “knuckle sandwich” was a big threat back in the ’50s. “A phrase that became popular in urban street movies like Bowery Boys in the 1950s, this term refers to a punch in the mouth or teeth like a lunch serving,” Friedmann says. And while you don’t want to mean it literally, obviously, it can still be a funny “threat.”

“While it may not ring of the most class or elegance, in some settings we can all admit there’s some fun and nostalgia involved with its use,” Friedmann says, “and it beats a lot of modern day foul language and threats we may use now to describe similar intent. Plus, let’s be honest, this term itself can’t really be taken that seriously in modern days.”

6

“Stuff It”

The term “stuff it” was used extensively in the 1950s when someone was mad, Rappaport says. Instead of telling them to f*ck off, they might have said “stuff it” instead. And since it has such an old school charm, it might be fun to say more often, today.

7

“Put A Lid On It”

This phrase may sound darling. But back in the ’50s, it meant business. “When you wanted someone to stop talking about something or shut up, you used to tell them to ‘put a lid on it’ or ‘can it,'” Rappaport says.

8

“That’s So Mickey Mouse”

“When someone referred to doing something as being ‘so Mickey Mouse,’ they meant it was either so easy it required no effort, or it was dumb,” Rappaport says. And that’s likely because Mickey Mouse was typically reserved for kids.

“This originated around 1955 after Disneyland opened and when the Mickey Mouse Club was formed,” she says. “This was probably originated by teenagers feeling they were too old for Disney or too hip.”

9

‘Riffraff”

This word, used to describe folks who were viewed as disreputable, was quite rude back in the ’50s. “Its origins are from old French verbs rifler, to spoil or strip, and raffler, to carry off,” Gabby Wallace, an expert on English language learning, tells Bustle. “Now its use is more humorous, but it should definitely be brought back as an insult.”

10

“Heavens To Betsy”

“This all-American anachronistic phrase was used to show astonishment,” Wallace says. “One theory is that it came from Betsy Ross, who stitched the first American flag.”

Of course, it’s always fine to use four letter words, if you so choose. But there’s something fun about saying things like “heavens to Betsy,” instead.

11

“Party Pooper”

Anastasia Gepp/Shutterstock

To call someone a “party pooper” was to basically take away all their cool. And that was not cool back in the day.

As Friedmann says, “The term ‘party pooper’ started emerging around the 1950s to describe that ‘wet blanket’ friend […] who wears out the party at the end of the night. Nowadays, we may use harsher language or bullying terms to make a person feel bad when they may just be tired. In modern times, the term ‘party pooper’ seems lighthearted, and like something you can call your friend in a joking manner without hurting any feelings.”

That’s the joy of old-fashioned language. While they can still have a powerful meaning, these words are officially too old to pack the sting they once had. And yet they still get the point across, in a fun and charming way.

BDG Media, Inc.

Charming, fun, and yet just the right amount of salty, curse words from the 1950s have a certain extra somethin’ that many modern day insults seem to lack. Our four letter words and other caustic phrases get the point across, and they certainly have a place in our vocabulary. But it can be effective to throw in the occasional “get bent” or “oh, fudge” as well.

“When you say something unexpected, you will definitely throw someone off balance — and it can lighten the moment,” relationship expert and spiritual counselor Davida Rappaport, tells Bustle. This can come in handy during heated moments, when you want to change the direction of a heated conversation.

“A lot of these terms are definitely a lot less offensive in modern times and perhaps even endearing to a certain extent,” Beverly Friedmann, writer and content manager for ReviewingThis, tells Bustle. “They also tend to catch people off-guard, can be fun to use, and may strike up a conversation.” Because nothing will get people chatting quite like using the phrase “that’s so Mickey Mouse.”

Whatever your reason, if you’d like to bring back curse words from the ’50s and other old-fashioned sayings, read on below for a few choice phrases, so you’ll know just what to say the next time you’re angry, annoyed, or surprised.

1

“Get Bent”

Back in the day, telling someone to “get bent” basically meant you wanted them to drop dead, Friedmann says. It was super popular in the 1950s, but isn’t something you hear much today.

“One of the most interesting parts of this 1950s curse/slang term is how language has evolved throughout time,” she says. “If you told someone to ‘get bent’ today on the street, you probably wouldn’t have any problems.” It does, however, have a certain flair to it. And may be something we want to bring back.

2

“Oh, Fudge”

Nothing sounds more old-school than saying “oh, fudge” instead of the usual four letter word, as was tradition back in the day. “Many people used to say, ‘oh, fudge’ because it was a bit more polite and in many cases, their intent would be known without causing offense,” Rappaport says.

3

“Scram!”

Back in the ’50s, if someone was pushing your buttons, telling them to “scram” was a forceful, yet effective, way to get them out of your face.

“The word ‘scram’ was introduced in the late 1920s, but was very popular in the 1950s when teenagers used to tell their younger siblings or anyone they did not want having around to leave,” Rappaport says.

4

“Make Like A Tree And Leave”

If you want someone to get out of your face, try saying “why don’t you make like a tree and leave?” This fun play on words was meant as an insult back in the ’50s, Rappaport says, but was just a little bit nicer than straight up telling someone to go.

5

“Knuckle Sandwich”

Telling someone you were going to give them a “knuckle sandwich” was a big threat back in the ’50s. “A phrase that became popular in urban street movies like Bowery Boys in the 1950s, this term refers to a punch in the mouth or teeth like a lunch serving,” Friedmann says. And while you don’t want to mean it literally, obviously, it can still be a funny “threat.”

“While it may not ring of the most class or elegance, in some settings we can all admit there’s some fun and nostalgia involved with its use,” Friedmann says, “and it beats a lot of modern day foul language and threats we may use now to describe similar intent. Plus, let’s be honest, this term itself can’t really be taken that seriously in modern days.”

6

“Stuff It”

The term “stuff it” was used extensively in the 1950s when someone was mad, Rappaport says. Instead of telling them to f*ck off, they might have said “stuff it” instead. And since it has such an old school charm, it might be fun to say more often, today.

7

“Put A Lid On It”

This phrase may sound darling. But back in the ’50s, it meant business. “When you wanted someone to stop talking about something or shut up, you used to tell them to ‘put a lid on it’ or ‘can it,'” Rappaport says.

8

“That’s So Mickey Mouse”

“When someone referred to doing something as being ‘so Mickey Mouse,’ they meant it was either so easy it required no effort, or it was dumb,” Rappaport says. And that’s likely because Mickey Mouse was typically reserved for kids.

“This originated around 1955 after Disneyland opened and when the Mickey Mouse Club was formed,” she says. “This was probably originated by teenagers feeling they were too old for Disney or too hip.”

9

‘Riffraff”

This word, used to describe folks who were viewed as disreputable, was quite rude back in the ’50s. “Its origins are from old French verbs rifler, to spoil or strip, and raffler, to carry off,” Gabby Wallace, an expert on English language learning, tells Bustle. “Now its use is more humorous, but it should definitely be brought back as an insult.”

10

“Heavens To Betsy”

“This all-American anachronistic phrase was used to show astonishment,” Wallace says. “One theory is that it came from Betsy Ross, who stitched the first American flag.”

Of course, it’s always fine to use four letter words, if you so choose. But there’s something fun about saying things like “heavens to Betsy,” instead.

11

“Party Pooper”

Anastasia Gepp/Shutterstock

To call someone a “party pooper” was to basically take away all their cool. And that was not cool back in the day.

As Friedmann says, “The term ‘party pooper’ started emerging around the 1950s to describe that ‘wet blanket’ friend […] who wears out the party at the end of the night. Nowadays, we may use harsher language or bullying terms to make a person feel bad when they may just be tired. In modern times, the term ‘party pooper’ seems lighthearted, and like something you can call your friend in a joking manner without hurting any feelings.”

That’s the joy of old-fashioned language. While they can still have a powerful meaning, these words are officially too old to pack the sting they once had. And yet they still get the point across, in a fun and charming way.

Florida Move To Ban Transgender Medical Treatment For Children

by Tony Davenport | Fri, Nov 11 2022

The predicted red wave in the 2022 midterm elections turned out to be a mere splash. Media analysts will read the tea leaves and decipher what this means about GOP messaging and other apparently insightful lessons to be learned. This is all BS. This election was possibly more fraudulent than the 2020 election.

In 2020 Trump likely won by 10-12 million votes or more. I make that assertion based on the number of votes Trump received in his reelection campaign above the number of votes that Obama received, the number of votes Clinton was awarded, and the alleged attribution of voted to Biden. Biden allegedly received 81 million votes, Obama received 69 million, and Trump supposedly only 74 million.

I have yet to find anyone to explain how Biden could possibly receive more votes than Obama while hiding in his basement. Biden probably received less votes than Hillary Clinton which was about 65 million. In Florida, Trump actually received 1.1 million more votes than DeSantis in his recent landslide victory. Nationwide, Trump received more votes than any sitting president in history.

Currently, the economy is dismal, inflation out of control, and 75% of Americans say the country is headed in the wrong direction. In addition to these salient facts, for the past two and half years, Democrat governors have been acting like total fascists. Yet, we are to believe that Democrats gained two governor’s seats and one senate seat? This defies all logic and reason and is total BS.
Consider the case of Florida. Governor Ron DeSantis who won with almost 60% of the vote, a very similar percentage to the Republican governor of Wyoming in his victory. Wyoming is a very Republican state. Florida Republicans are not as conservative or libertarian as Wyoming. Florida Republicans are generally more moderate, although this is clearly changing since

Trump and DeSantis.

Why did DeSantis win so big?

After being pressured into an unconstitutional lockdown (which did have many loopholes) DeSantis apparently recognized the con and pushed back, and even apologized for the lockdown, stating that it caused harm. Florida opened up its state forcing other Republican governors to follow suit. DeSantis pushed back on lockdowns, as well as mask and vaccine mandates. DeSantis hired Dr. Ladapo as Florida’s surgeon general. The Florida department of health gave guidance against wearing masks in community settings, then the Florida Department of Health advised against children getting Covid shots because the risk outweighed the benefit, and more recently, the Florida Department of Health has advised against men under 40 getting the shots because there is an 84% increase in cardiac death.

The governor undercut cities and counties forcing mask mandates by basically taking away their ability to enforce fines. The Florida Department of Health created broad exemptions for Covid shots allowing anybody to claim an exemption and not have to get the shot. Even healthcare workers working at Medicare facilities. This was done by creating a broad religious exemption based on an ethical or moral belief, which also states that the employer can’t ask the employee about their beliefs.
Governor DeSantis has also pushed back against critical race theory, and the grooming of children with transgenderism, and the state is about to make gender transitioning illegal for minors.

Other actions contrary to the Woke mob include laws allowing motorist to defend themselves from attacks by rioting mobs and firing prosecutors refusing to enforce laws against rioters.

Florida turned from purple to deep red on the political map in a few years. Floridians have typically been moderate. This political change occurred because DeSantis is perceived as anti-lockdown, anti-mandates, and increasingly anti Covid shots, as well as anti-Woke.

In short, DeSantis is perceived as pro freedom, and Floridian’s decided in favor of freedom over fascism.


This is the crux of the issue and the logical leap of faith required to believe the election results of the 2022 midterms.

The Pennsylvania senate election literally gave us a brain damaged left wing fascist who is likely to of had a stroke as a result of the Covid shot. This same candidate who chased an unarmed black man with a gun in the past, dominated the black vote in Philadelphia.

It is also a leap of faith to believe that Michigan, Wisconsin, and Minnesota, decided to reelect fascist governors. The same reason that moderate Floridians chose freedom over fascism is the same reason that these states would reject their fascist governors.

Freedom is popular!’

SOURCE:

%d bloggers like this: