for some reason you aren’t aware of the recent release of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine safety data, then I’d say the 24/7 mainstream media coverage of the Russia/Ukraine conflict is doing its job.
At first glance, it is tragically obvious why the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested a ridiculous window of 75 years to release all the Pfizer vaccine data. Conveniently, most of the people affected by the questionable jab would be dead by then. Thankfully, US District Judge Mark Pittman of the Northern District of Texas believed the release of this data to be “paramount to public importance,” and required the FDA to release around 12,000 documents immediately, and then 55,000 pages a month until all documents are released. This shortens the full release of all pertinent data to around eight months.
After nearly a year of being pestered, shamed, coerced and guilted into receiving one of the COVID-19 vaccines, Joe Biden on Jan. 4, had the nerve to say there is “no excuse for anyone being unvaccinated.” With the proof in black and white from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration itself, we actually have 1,291 “excuses” to remain unvaccinated, Mr. President.
Former company employees who filed qui tam (whistleblower) suits were the most instrumental in bringing to light the evidence that resulted in the largest number of federal settlements over the past 10 years.
From 1991-2000 qui tam law suits accounted for only 9% of settlements with the government. But from 2001-2010, qui tam settlements comprised 67% of the billions in payouts.
The federal government levied the largest financial penalties for the illegal off-label promotion of drugs and state governments levied the largest penalties for deliberate overcharging of Medicaid–both crimes yielded pharmaceutical companies with huge profits. Public Citizen found that state Medicaid programs were paying as much as 12 times the actual cost of a drug.
Additional unlawful practices by pharmaceutical companies include: unlawful monopoly practices to extend patent pricing or collusion with other companies, kickbacks to providers, hospitals, doctors; concealing negative study findings; poor manufacturing practices and selling contaminated products; environmental violations; accounting or tax fraud and insider trading; illigal distribution of unapproved pharmaceutical products.
Thus, the size of the financial penalties levied paled when compared with the profits from illegal practices–which is why this industry has escalated its criminal marketing modus operandi.
We wholeheartedly agree with the assessment of Public Citizen: “Clearly, the continuing increase in violations by pharmaceutical compaines–despite the large financial settlements– demonstrates that the current enforcement system is not working. The lack of criminal prosecution that would result in jailing of company executives has been cited as a major reason for the continuing large-scale fraud, in addition to the fact that current settlement payouts may not be a sufficient deterrent.”
Adding insult to injury, who do you think is footing the cost of legal and settlement expenditures incurred by pharmaceutical companies? Just check the increased price of drugs and figure it out.
Finally, government suits against pharmaceutical companies have avoided charging or penalizing pharmaceutical companies for the severe harmful consequences suffered by consumers from illegal marketed harmful drugs. This failure to address the disabling adverse drug effects and drug-linked deahts resulting from illegal pharmaceutical activities contributes to the devaluation of human beings–thereby buttressing this industry’s disregard for the welfare of its customers.
Vera Hassner Sharav
Let’s start with the fact the PFDA (the P is not a typo) asked a federal court for 75 years to make public the many thousands of pages of data submitted to them by Pfizer to support the EUA they (the PFDA) issued.
One interpretation of this action is that they wanted the data to stay hidden for a long time to hide fraud and/or criminality (same thing). The other is that they only had enough staff to complete this task within 75 years. Let’s ignore the 2nd one as absurd on its face (especially since they seem to be pouring out documents monthly after the judge ordered them to). Where there is a will there is a way apparently.
Now why would they want to keep the data hidden? What lies within the realm of possibilities is that at the time they went to court, they knew the EUA and the resulting massive national and global vaccine campaign were pre-determined and independent of whatever “science” emerged to support or not support the campaign. Unfortunately for them, the “science” was not supportive. At all. So they tried to suppress the serious troubling toxicity and lack of efficacy data contained within those documents. Well the court ordered them to make public thousands of pages of documents each month. My hypothesis above seems to be validated by the uncovering of what is not just troubling, but absolutely terrifying data on the lack of safety in pregnancy. While Dr Naomi Wolf and the WarRoom/DailyClout Research Volunteers recently corrected a report that overcounted miscarriages in one section of the Pfizer documents, they are right to have early and often called attention to signals about this issue overall. Indeed in May 2022, they broke the story of another section of the Pfizer documents, in which the mortality rate of fetuses and babies of women vaccinated with Pfizer’s mRNA injection was about 80 per cent.
Now, let’s do a dive on just one page of the many thousands. See below, Section 5.3.6, Page 12 of the document called “Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorization Adverse Event Reports.”
Looking at the first bullet under the header: Pregnancy cases: 274 cases including: In this paragraph, at first read, it is just a list of adverse events and numbers, detailed in a way that is confusing at best, and obfuscating at worst. I think it is the latter because, if you do some simple arithmetic trying to parse that paragraph, you end up with this:
270 pregnancies were reported in vaccinated women during the first 12 weeks of the vaccine campaign. In 238 of them, “no outcome was provided.” So, they only knew the outcome of 32 pregnancies reported. What happened in those 32 pregnancies they followed up on?
My hands are literally trembling as I write this, but here goes. In these 32 pregnancies, there were
The first graph that the Canadian government deleted was this one:Figure 2: “Cumulative % of people who have received a COVID-19 vaccine in Canada by vaccination status” was removed on January 10, 2023 (click here) (it’s gone on next update (click here))
Just before this data was deleted, 1st booster uptake in Canada was reported at 50.7%, 2nd booster uptake was reported at 23.4%.
Myocarditis in Kids Under 18 Cases Up by Over 100x in Canada
Large Canadian hospital: before Covid, they’d see 2 cases per year. Now they see 27 in just 6 weeks. That’s a 117X increase. But the CDC says it’s only “slightly elevated.”
The IWK Health Centre is a major pediatric hospital and trauma center in Halifax, Nova Scotia that provides care to maritime youth, children and women from Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, Prince Edward Island and beyond.
They’ve seen 27 myocarditis cases in a 6 week period for kids under 18. Normally, they see 2 cases a year. So they are seeing an increase of 117X the normal rate.
“This ‘Vaccine’ Kills 83% of all Fetuses in Pregnant Women” – Dr. Peter McCullough.
WSJ member Allysia Finley has taken a flamethrower to vaccine makers over their “deceptive” campaign for bivalent Covid boosters, and slams several federal agencies for taking “the unprecedented step of ordering vaccine makers to produce them and recommending them without data supporting their safety or efficacy.”
You might have heard a radio advertisement warning that if you’ve had Covid, you could get it again and experience even worse symptoms. The message, sponsored by the Health and Human Services Department, claims that updated bivalent vaccines will improve your protection.
This is deceptive advertising. But the public-health establishment’s praise for the bivalent shots shouldn’t come as a surprise. -WSJ
Florida Collier County Commissioners and over 200 residents were presented with evidence that the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ are bioweapons.
Emerald Robinson and I discussed the hearing during this interview. During a public hearing on February 14, 2023, Florida Collier County Commissioners and over 200 residents were presented with evidence that the COVID-19 ‘vaccines’ are bioweapons. The hearing was to vote on a $1.4mm NIH grant that included funds used for COVID-19 ‘vaccine education’, among other CDC public ‘health’ initiatives. The commissioners voted unanimously to return the $1.4 million grant in full to the NIH. As part of the hearing, I shared FDA-submitted Pfizer documents and Florida state law demonstrating that the COVID-19 mRNA injections are bioweapons.
Emerald Robinson and I discussed the hearing during this interview.
While I’ve made the case that the COVID-19 injections are bioweapons more than a hundred times over the past 22 months, February 14, 2023, was the 1st opportunity I had to present these claims to government elected officials in a public government setting.
Vaccine Harms Are Biodefense Plan’s Collateral Damage
Vaccine Harms Are Biodefense Plan’s Collateral Damage All the time, money and research sunk into attempts to develop bioweapon countermeasures caused everyone involved to view Covid as a golden opportunity. In fact, governments, pharmaceutical companies and NGOs invested in biodefense research were determined that the Covid genetic vaccines would “succeed” no matter what. They were not trying to murder anyone, but they also did not plan to stop or slow down, regardless of incidental injuries or death. https://brownstone.org/articles/vaccine-harms-are-biodefense-plans-collateral-damage/
Jim> So true! I’m in shock at the number of “smart” people I know scared to death, and throwing all past knowledge and common sense out the window. It befuddles my mind… nothing is obvious to scared people returning from the foray into fear https://boriquagato.substack.com/p/nothing-is-obvious-to-scared-people
An Even Deadlier Pandemic, Warns New York Times Are we going to allow a repeat of what happened during Covid-19, or are we going to exercise critical thinking and our rights as citizens, to put an end to the growing biomedical security state? I choose the latter. We can start by critically examining what we’re being fed by the mainstream media, and by compromised government and public health officials, and refusing to be frightened and manipulated into another over reactive, unconstitutional, disastrous response to a pathogen. https://brownstone.org/articles/deadlier-pandemic-warns-new-york-times/
Japanese evidence of immune system thyroid dysfunction by Pfizer COVID injection (disruption of thyroid autoimmunity) with increased thyroid auto-antibodies after 2 doses of Pfizer jab plus booster 2 doses jab with Pfizer plus booster is causing thyroid problems, thyroid dysfunction, thyroid diseases (Morita and Mastuoka); thyroid antibodies increased post 2 doses & still elevated at 32 weeks By: Dr. Paul Alexander https://palexander.substack.com/p/japanese-evidence-of-immune-system -referenced study:
Dr. Naomi Wolf & Steve Bannon: ‘Autopsies Revealed Catastrophic Lesions On Many Organs Likely Caused By Covid Vaccine’; once again Dr. Wolf & Bannon are out front hammering for humanity, huge praise! Author Naomi Wolf, CEO of Dailyclout, talks to host Steve Bannon about the new report 56 proving that the Covid-19 vaccine causes deadly lesions on the lungs. Pathologist Arne Burkhardt By: Dr. Paul Alexander https://opalexander.substack.com/p/dr-naomi-wolf-and-steve-bannon-autopsies -referenced interview
‘The Lancet Acknowledges Natural Immunity Superior to mRNA COVID Vaccines Immunity acquired from past COVID-19 infection provides strong, lasting protection against severe outcomes from the illness at a level “as high if not higher” than that provided by mRNA vaccines, according to a study published Thursday in The Lancet. By Brenda Baletti, Ph.D. https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-infection-natural-immunity-superior/?itm_term=home
FDA Website: Info, Timeline and Guidelines of Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccines Comirnaty, Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine, Bivalent.
Between 1978 and 1999, 2.5 millionAmerican men, women and children died preventable deaths in US hospitals and 17 million suffered preventable injuries. Two recent reports confirm that American hospitals continue to cause serious preventable harm to patients.
The question, that Michael Millenson* asks in HealthAffairs (below) is, WHY?
Why has the medical profession failed to take proven corrective safety measures to prevent the killing of patients?
“Measuring Preventable Harm,” a commentary in JAMA, 2009, noted that “Clinicians have labeled virtually all harm as inevitable for decades.”
However, there are numerous examples of preventable harm that refute the “inevitability” defense.
1. Letting children die:
Children’s hospitals refused to join a collaborative to learn what steps are needed to slash catheter-associated blood infections which kill a quarter of children infected.
“At the 2009 AcademyHealth meeting, Dr. Richard Brilli of Nationwide Children’s Hospital presented data showing how a collaborative backed by some of the most respected organizations in pediatric care had slashed the rate of catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CA-BSIs). CA-BSIs are relatively common, very expensive and can be quite deadly (up to one quarter of victims die). Brilli said his collaborative had tried to recruit 330 pediatric intensive care units to join the initial participants, but after three years, just sixty had accepted. The reasons Brilli said he’s been given indicated to me that few had taken the time to examine the collaborative’s methodology or results. Instead, respondents asserted that their patients were sicker, their hospital was busier than the others in the study, that joining would make them look bad to others, or that the mortality reduction didn’t apply because “I am in a world famous center.”
2. Hospital providers fail to wash their hands:
According to a Joint Commission project, 8 hospitals that volunteered to participate had a baseline hand hygiene rate typical of hospitals nationwide:
only 48% follow hand-washing guidelines: that is worse than the worst rate at the worst big public men’s room in the U.S.
But, as Millenson correctly notes, “rather than giving providers an ultimatum, we launch campaigns to ask patients to ask providers to please wash up…”
The profession is quick to absolve itself from professional responsibility and culpability for contributing, if not causing, preventable patient deaths and injuries. Indeed, the authors of a Harvard study in the New England Journal of Medicine(Nov. 25, 2010) acknowledged as much in carefully couched language:
” The absence of large-scale improvement is not evidence that current efforts to improve safety are futile. On the contrary, data have shown that focused efforts to reduce discrete harms, such as nosocomial infections and surgical complications, can significantly improve safety.”
But the real reason that the killing continues unabated is professional inertia, patients’invisibility, and added income for hospitals.
This is a shocking confirmation about the prevailing culture of arrogance: contrary to the rhetoric, for America’s medical professionals, patient safety is simply not a priority.
Absent public or peer pressure, doctors and hospitals are reluctant to adopt interventions whose efficacy they mistrust to prevent an epidemic they really don’t see and which is profoundly discomfiting to confront.
* Michael Millenson is a nationally recognized expert on improving the quality of the American health and the author of the book “Demanding Medical Excellence: Doctors and Accountability in the Information Age”
A report by Public Citizen documents the enormous scale of pharmaceutical industry lawless activities during the past two decades–crimes that resulted in a minimum of $1 million in penalties paid to the government.
Between 1991-2010, there were 165 criminal and/or civil settlements by major pharmaceutical companies comprising of $19.8 billion in penalties.
Four of the world’s largest drug companies–GlaxoSmithKline, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, and Schering-Plough–accounted for 53% ($10.5 billion) of penalties during these two decades.
If that isn’t shocking enough, during the past five years, Big Pharma has been engaged in a veritable crime spree:
73% of these settlements (121) and 75% of the penalties ($14.8 billion) occurred between 2006-2010.
“While the defense industry used to be the biggest defrauder of the federal government under the False Claims Act (FCA), a law enacted in 1863 to prevent defense contractor fraud, the pharmaceutical industry has greatly overtaken the defense industry in recent years. The pharmaceutical industry now tops not only the defense industry, but all other industries in the total amount of fraud payments for actions taken against the federal government under the False Claims Act.”
Former company employees who filed qui tam (whistleblower) suits were the most instrumental in bringing to light the evidence that resulted in the largest number of federal settlements over the past 10 years.
From 1991-2000 qui tam law suits accounted for only 9% of settlements with the government. But from 2001-2010, qui tam settlements comprised 67% of the billions in payouts.
The federal government levied the largest financial penalties for the illegal off-label promotion of drugs and state governments levied the largest penalties for deliberate overcharging of Medicaid–both crimes yielded pharmaceutical companies with huge profits. Public Citizen found that state Medicaid programs were paying as much as 12 times the actual cost of a drug.
Additional unlawful practices by pharmaceutical companies include: unlawful monopoly practices to extend patent pricing or collusion with other companies, kickbacks to providers, hospitals, doctors; concealing negative study findings; poor manufacturing practices and selling contaminated products; environmental violations; accounting or tax fraud and insider trading; illigal distribution of unapproved pharmaceutical products.
Thus, the size of the financial penalties levied paled when compared with the profits from illegal practices–which is why this industry has escalated its criminal marketing modus operandi.
We wholeheartedly agree with the assessment of Public Citizen: “Clearly, the continuing increase in violations by pharmaceutical compaines–despite the large financial settlements– demonstrates that the current enforcement system is not working. The lack of criminal prosecution that would result in jailing of company executives has been cited as a major reason for the continuing large-scale fraud, in addition to the fact that current settlement payouts may not be a sufficient deterrent.”
Adding insult to injury, who do you think is footing the cost of legal and settlement expenditures incurred by pharmaceutical companies? Just check the increased price of drugs and figure it out.
Finally, government suits against pharmaceutical companies have avoided charging or penalizing pharmaceutical companies for the severe harmful consequences suffered by consumers from illegal marketed harmful drugs. This failure to address the disabling adverse drug effects and drug-linked deahts resulting from illegal pharmaceutical activities contributes to the devaluation of human beings–thereby buttressing this industry’s disregard for the welfare of its customers.
The Trailblazing Patriot 